Exec from struggling RadioShack joins HHGregg

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HHGregg Inc. has hired a new chief operating officer about a month after the executive formerly in that position left to become CEO of a bicycle retailer.

The Indianapolis-based electronics and appliance chain announced Wednesday that it had hired Troy Risch, former executive vice president of store operations for RadioShack Corp., as its new COO.

“As we continue to transform the company, Troy's expansive experience in retail store operations and real estate will be instrumental in driving the strategic initiatives for HHGregg’s long-term growth,” CEO Dennis May said in prepared comments.

In the move, Risch trades one big retailer struggling to find its footing for another.

RadioShack is in the midst of a turnaround plan that has grown sluggish due to disagreements with its lenders, according to the Wall Street Journal. The chain announced in March that it planned to close 1,100 stores in the U.S., but some lenders reportedly are proposing that as many as 2,000 stores be closed.

At RadioShack, Risch was responsible for 4,400 stores. He resigned on April 18. He will assume his duties at HHGregg on May 5.

Shares of HHGregg have been taking a beating since late September, when they traded for more than $20 a share. Shares stood at $8.54 during morning trading on Wednesday. The company has struggled to find a winning product mix, focusing more heavily on appliances, furniture and fitness equipment after the bottom fell out of the TV and video markets.

On April 15, HHGregg issued a warning to investors that it expected a sharp drop in fiscal fourth-quarter sales.

On March 31, COO Gregg Throgmartin stepped down to become CEO of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.-based BikeStreet USA. His departure left HHGregg without executive leadership from a member of its founding family for the first time since its first store opened in 1955.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.