Expansion of NCAA tournament now seen as likely

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The allure of a bigger pay day for athletic directors and presidents of Big Ten schools is proving to be enough to earn their support for a plan to expand the NCAA basketball tournament to 96 teams.

And they said they’re not alone in their support of the idea. Big Ten officials are now saying expansion of the tournament next year is likely. The issue will be discussed at an April 29 NCAA board meeting.

As IBJ first reported in December, the NCAA is contemplating expanding its annual men’s basketball tournament from the current three-week, 65-team format to one featuring an added week and another 31 teams.

Proponents of the plan say it will generate a bigger television-rights deal for the not-for-profit NCAA, which disperses 95 percent of that revenue to member institutions.

Thoughts of expanding the tournament are heating up as a unilateral opt-out clause for the NCAA with its current TV partner, CBS, approaches. The NCAA signed an 11-year, $6 billion deal with CBS to air the tournament in 1999. The deal runs from 2003 through 2013, but the NCAA can end it after the 2010 tournament.

The NCAA has an option to end the deal following this year’s tournament and renegotiate with CBS and/or other broadcasters.

For more on the possible expansion, check out The Score blog.


  • Of Course
    Do math, 64 teams in this year leaving hundreds out...whose presidents vote 'expand'. Same thing happened with Indiana Class Basketball. Let the 64 this-year-in-the-ncaa team-presidents vote and see what the results are.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ