IBJNews

Ex-Peterbilt dealer hauls trailer manufacturer to court

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Semi trucks and trailers go together like hot dogs and buns.

But a longtime Indianapolis-based Peterbilt dealer that until recently sold both trucks and trailers is having a hard time unloading the trailer side of the dealership.

Steve Riddle, who last year sold the Peterbilt part of Utility-Peterbilt, is battling California-based Utility Trailer Manufacturing Co. for allegedly blocking the sale of the dealership’s trailer sales arm, known as Utility Trailers of Indianapolis, or UTI.

Riddle’s UTI alleges intentional interference with a contract in a lawsuit filed against Utility Trailer Manufacturing last month in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

Joining UTI as plaintiff is Peterbilt of Indiana, a unit of Wisconsin-based JX Enterprises Inc., which acquired Riddle’s truck-sales business late last year for an undisclosed price.

The former Utility-Peterbilt, 4225 S. Harding, now operates as JX Peterbilt Indianapolis.

Peterbilt of Indiana is also under contract to pay more than $1 million for UTI, the trailer sales arm of the former Utility-Peterbilt, according to court records.

But California trailer maker Utility Trailer effectively has blocked the sale by refusing to acknowledge the proposed buyer as a qualified Utility Trailer dealer, the suit contends.

Utility Trailer, in a response to the suit, said one of its concerns is that JX Enterprises operates truck dealerships in other areas where Utility Trailer already has trailer dealers.  

JX Enterprises has 18 locations in the upper Midwest.

Utility said it offered to help franchisee UTI liquidate its trailers, or to continue to recognize it as a dealer.

The suit seeks unspecified damages.

Representing Riddle and Peterbilt of Indiana is local law firm Stewart & Irwin, which represents a number of car dealers in the state.  

Riddle was unavailable for comment on the lawsuit.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Great headline
    "Ex-Peterbilt dealer hauls trailer manufacturer to court", I bet they were up all night coming up with that spectacular catchphrase!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT