IBJNews

Express Scripts’ Medco deal may be delayed by potential suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Express Scripts Inc.’s bid to acquire Medco Health Solutions Inc. and create the largest U.S. pharmacy-benefits manager may be delayed by a lawsuit being considered by five states.

Attorneys general in New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Texas and California are waiting to see if the U.S. Federal Trade Commission approves the $29.1 billion proposed deal, said two people familiar with the matter, who weren’t authorized to speak publicly and asked not to be identified. Both companies have sizable operations in Indiana.

State officials are concerned the FTC will approve the deal with conditions that don’t guard against rising prescription prices and decreased pharmacy services, the people said. Should the acquisition be cleared by the FTC, a lawsuit by the states may slow the formal close of the merger, said Les Funtleyder, a health strategist and portfolio manager at Miller Tabak & Co., which owns Express Scripts shares.

“This signals the states think the Federal Trade Commission is going to green-light the deal,” Funtleyder said. “Whether or not five states are enough to scuttle the deal, that would seem unlikely since that’s the Federal Trade Commission’s job.”

When the merger was announced last July, New Jersey-based Medco had 430 workers at a $140 million automated pharmacy and distribution center in Whitestown. It planned to ramp up Boone County employment to 1,300, but fell short of that goal after losing some large contracts.

St. Louis-based Express Scripts, which acquired Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc.’s pharmacy benefits subsidiary in 2009, said last year it had 400 employees at a specialty drug distribution facility near Indianapolis International Airport and planned to add 180 positions there by 2012.

The gap between Medco’s share price and the value of Express Scripts’ cash-and-stock bid narrowed to $2.53 on Friday, about the smallest difference since the deal was announced, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That indicates traders betting on the deal’s outcome now have more confidence it will close than they did a few months ago, Funtleyder said. Medco closed at $70.29 Friday.

More than 25 states, including the five considering a lawsuit, are investigating the deal for possible antitrust violations, the people said.

Two pharmacy groups opposing the acquisition said March 9 that the FTC asked them to suggest ways to revise the deal so it wouldn’t harm competition. The request may indicate the agency will approve the deal with conditions, said Jeffrey Schmidt, a former director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.

The states may seek a temporary delay in the acquisition’s close and a court order to permanently prevent the deal’s consummation, said Billy Vigdor, an antitrust lawyer with Vinson & Elkins LLP in Washington, D.C., who represents investors with an interest in the deal.

Brian Henry, a spokesman for Express Scripts, and Lowell Weiner, a spokesman for Medco, declined to comment on the potential lawsuit by the states.

A 1990 Supreme Court case, California v. American Stores Co., endorsed the states’ ability to challenge acquisitions that federal antitrust regulators had approved. In that case, California sued to block American Stores’ purchase of Lucky Stores Inc. after the FTC had approved the deal on the condition the company sell several supermarkets.

It can be difficult for states to win when the FTC has allowed a deal to go through, said Andrew Gavil, an antitrust law professor at Howard University in Washington.

Any conditions the FTC imposes before approving a deal—such as selling parts of a business—show the agency had concerns over the acquisition as originally proposed, he said.

In that case, the “issue becomes the adequacy of the remedy to solve” the anticompetitive nature of the deal, Gavil said.

Pharmacy-benefits managers like Express Scripts and Medco negotiate prices with drugmakers for health-plan sponsors, manage worker claims and track patients’ use of medicines. Their profits are tied to cutting their clients’ drug costs.

Spokesman for the attorneys general of the five states and Cecelia Prewett, an FTC spokeswoman, declined to comment.

A combined Express-Medco would handle 34 percent of prescriptions in the U.S. this year, according to Adam Fein, founder and president of Pembroke Consulting Inc. in Philadelphia.

That share will shrink to 29 percent next year because UnitedHealth Group Inc. of Minnetonka, Minn., the biggest U.S. health insurer by sales, switched from Medco to its own pharmacy-benefits unit, OptumRx, Fein said.

The question for regulators is whether the combination will create a near-monopoly leading to higher consumer prices or whether rivals can provide enough competition.

A decision by the FTC has been expected by the end of the month, though the time frame can be extended if necessary, according to one of the people. Express Scripts has said it expects the transaction to close in the first half of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT