IBJNews

Express Scripts to add 182 pharmacy jobs by 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

St. Louis-based Express Scripts Inc. plans to consolidate its specialty pharmaceutical operations in Indianapolis, which could bring 182 jobs to the city by the end of 2012, the company announced Wednesday afternoon.

The company will begin hiring additional pharmacy technicians next month to work at a facility located at the Indianapolis International Airport.

The specialty drug distribution facility was launched in 2007 by Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. to help manage the complex and the costly biotech drugs taken by some of its patients.

But, in December, Express Scripts acquired WellPoint’s pharmacy benefit subsidiary, called NextRx, for $4.7 billion.

About 400 workers at the Indianapolis airport facility became Express Scripts employees.

Express Scripts, which is the nation’s second-largest drug distribution firm behind Medco Health Solutions, will invest $5.17 million to expand its Indianapolis operations.

Indiana Economic Development Corp. offered Express Scripts up to $2.95 million in performance-based tax credits and up to $50,000 in training grants based on the company's job creation plans. Also, the city of Indianapolis will support additional property tax abatement at the request of Indianapolis Economic Development Inc.

"We certainly welcome the jobs Express Scripts has decided to locate in Indianapolis," said Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard in a prepared statement. "The decision to consolidate operations here is indicative that the benefits our city provides continue to make Indianapolis a strategic choice.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • please help me out
    I was just wondering if you tell me an address or phone number to that express scripts location near the Indianapolis Airport. For whatever reason I cannot find it anywhere. Thank you for your time, Jessica
  • That was a joke!
    They didnt hire anyone! They 66 people go last month and have not hired anyone new. They let all the leads have a choice if they wanted to apply for a diff. position with the same pay but more responsabilities but still have not hired anyone new and says we are still over staffed! They took our shift diff down fron 10% 2p-10p to 5% from 8p to 10p! We have to stay late because others have left due to sever micro management therefore we have the same amount of work with A LOT less poeple! but we get into trouble for getting overtime!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT