IBJOpinion

FAENZI: Look for simple solution to complex immigration problem

Carol Faenzi
December 11, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

FaenziWhen my immigrant grandparents arrived on Ellis Island in the early 1900s, they experienced a wide range of emotions at the prospect of living in an unknown world, far from their homeland.

As they crossed the threshold that would forever alter their lives, they first had to go through the process of entry, including a medical examination, a literacy test and a litany of questions with respect to how they would support themselves, where they were going and who was there to sponsor them.

Millions of immigrants had this same experience, through Ellis Island and other ports of entry. Many of you reading this know the stories well, because your own parents, grandparents or great-grandparents were part of this vast diaspora. It is a fact that at least 25 percent of Americans living today can trace their roots back to Ellis Island.

These stories never fail to produce a kind of nostalgia within us, as we recall their bravery, persistence and contributions to our country in so many ways. Our art, architecture, culinary choices and literature are just a few of the ways our country benefited from their entry. Other contributions in the form of infrastructure, labor laws and anti-discrimination laws made us more civilized, more just, even at the cost of much loss of life.

Today’s sorry state of affairs around immigration seems to have no resolution. Cries of “it’s not fair” to any proposed idea come from all sides. And it’s true, there is no “fair” solution possible. That, we can all agree on.

Recently, Harry Reid, the Democratic Senate majority leader, introduced language into a defense bill that stated that certain illegal immigrants who would serve in our U.S. military and attend college should be given a path to citizenship. This caused an immediate backlash from those who found fault with his including this in proposed legislation about defense. Whether this statement should be part of a defense bill, I will not comment on. The bigger question is, is it a worthy idea?

My grandparents encountered a structure, a process and a path to citizenship that was not perfect, but nonetheless gave them a way “in.” They endured racist behavior from Americans who felt threatened by their foreign ways, but they persisted and made lives for themselves and for their children. For that, I am very grateful.

During World War II, Italians and, to a larger extent, Japanese, living in the United States were unjustly rounded up into internment camps because of one thing: disproportionate fear.

The recent surge in anti-immigrant sentiment is again due to fear. We are afraid the economy is not going to get any better, so instead of acknowledging that many illegal immigrants do many of the jobs we don’t want to do, we start labeling them as “moochers.” Our fear of terrorism causes us to be suspicious of anyone who doesn’t look or behave “like us.” Many are taking the position of “win/lose” and there is no room for “win/win.”

We have to start from where we are. And “where we are” is that we are continuing to make personal and public decisions that are based on fear and what we might lose. This course of action means we are never going to find our way back to what this country stands for. “Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” has turned into “Get them the hell out of our town, state and country.”

The truth is, we are nearly all immigrants or descendants of immigrants. There is no “us” and “them.” And yet there is little compassion or forward thinking in most of what is being said about this subject.

We need to draw a line. I say we give all illegal immigrants a path to citizenship as long as they have not engaged in criminal activity and especially make it easy for those who will serve in our military, have paid taxes, or otherwise have contributed positively to society.

Oh, but that’s not fair, you say. No, it’s not. But it would stop the merry-go-round. It would produce a tremendous and collective sigh of relief in this country. Millions would stop living in fear. We could then focus our efforts on the process and, yes, a fair path to citizenship and the means to enforce it.

Too simplistic, you say? I say, it’s high time we start cutting through all the posturing designed to make everything in our lives more complicated than it needs to be. Simple solutions to complex problems are possible, as long as we are operating from both our heads and our hearts. The problem is, the collective ego in our society makes no room for that.

The plan has to come first. That’s what we should be talking about first. Not who gets to stay, who is sent back, who is not allowed in. Instead, we should be asking, “What should a path to citizenship be?” What should we do to make the assimilation process work well? How should we enforce the plan?

The past is behind us, yet we are still living in it. Likewise, we are allowing fear of the future to cause us to place blame instead of using the present to create something new, something positive.

The pervasive belief in this country that there is not enough for everybody does nothing but create more of the same: not enough for everybody. How do you stop this insane cycle without making some kind of clean break from the past?

We have to engage both our heads and our hearts. Of course, we need legislation that creates the path I speak of, which would include learning the English language and other assimilation necessities. But we also need to recognize that, in the first place, nobody truly wants to leave their homeland. How bad would conditions have to be in your world for you to feel forced to leave your home and possessions?

It is a tragedy that so many Americans today will not allow themselves to empathize. If having empathy were rated as highly as needing to be right, we might make some progress.

To those of you who still see yourselves as removed from immigration, I invite you to look over your shoulder and see your own immigrant ancestor right there behind you.•

__________

Faenzi is the author of “The Stonecutter’s Aria,” a novel based on the true stories of her immigrant Italian ancestors. She can be reached at cfaenzi@aol.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • "Frivolous" spelling error
    Sorry for spelling goof--fingers faster than brain. And maybe not even a good word for the columns like D.Mullinix, later S.Guyett presently capable but given enough column inches or latitude Cathy Kightlinger--while this may seem to some superficial reporting, there is a real need for the kind of out-and-about on-the-scene reporting but it has to also be "issue-oriented." And from someone who knows the community--and vice versa. Daily's revolving door changes of well-grounded familiar columnists like Mullinix,Guyett, others keeps having to "re-invent" the wheel with newcomers learning old names, groups, in short "institutional knowledge." So having heard and met writer Faenzi out-and-about in many local venues--book talks, architectural and cultural, social in many different venues locally makes me think she could be a great double-hitter regularly in IBJ==as is too-infrequent Frank Basile, afore-mentioned MMaurer and others.
  • CHEERS AND BOOS-ORCHIDS AND SCALLIONS TO IBJ RE C.FAENZI COLUMN
    This absolutely wonderful column by your "sometimes" writer C.Faenzi prompts me to write this comment of praise (to IBJ for providing this clarity and excellence of writing directed specifically to IBJ gurus Tom Harton and Mickey Maurer--but also of criticism specifically to the latter 2 people.

    First, with a town so deficit in good local reporting IBJ is the only alternative ray of illumination--both in the "business" arena which is its stated venue but also in the broader local news--crowded out of our chain-operated daily by policy and boilerplate. (an old newspaper term for untimely "filler" to occupy the white space around ads!)

    My mixed praise-criticism first to Mickey Maurer--he also writes amazingly wonderful columns like this--but more recently not often enough! My first proposed solution--make Mickey write more often--with this same broad clarity and impact. My second solution--make Mickey hire this writer--why? Because nature hates a vacuum. And when our local dailies folded into a chain cooky cutter clone, what disappeared and created a "vacuum" was in part the disappearance of skilled reporters/columnists--e.g.,Donna Mullinix's seemingly "frivalous" bold face reporting of parties,benefits--which did,however, bring tons of $$$$ and exposure to local "worthy causes" and those involved. Likewise,local-street-smart writers like David Mannweiler, Joe Gelarden--actual reporters out and about (as Ms.Faenzi seems to be) in the community's business/social/cultural doings---not chained to a desk and phone production line as today's daily writers are. Someone with wit,wisdom (again e.g. Mickey,Ms.F.) who can peer through the porthole into local relationship to bigger national issues--or just amuse,inform,entertain is what IBJ gives us already--but needs to give more. So either hire Ms.Faenzi, chain Mickey to his computer to write more--OR BOTH!!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT