Still hoping to sell securities, Fair Finance seeks extension

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tim Durham’s Fair Finance Co. says it needs another 30 days to provide the state of Ohio with a mountain of documents it requested relating to insider loans and other issues.

The company is continuing to seek clearance from Ohio securities regulators to sell a new round of investment certificates. The Akron, Ohio-based firm is pressing ahead despite allegations by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis that the company is operating like a Ponzi scheme, using revenue from the sale of new certificates to pay off earlier rounds of investors.

The Ohio Department of Commerce’s Division of Securities has twice turned Fair away, saying it would need additional information before deciding whether to allow the company to sell $250 million in additional certificates.

The Division of Securities on Dec. 3 called the company’s latest application “incomplete and inadequate” and gave Fair until this past Friday to provide a mountain of additional information.

But instead of providing the information, Ronald Kaffen, a securities attorney representing Fair, sent a letter to the division on Friday seeking the extension.

Kaffen said Fair needed the extra time because it is only now getting computers and servers back from the FBI, which seized the equipment and company documents during Nov. 24 raids in Indianapolis and Akron.

Fair’s prior registration, from July 2008, expired that same day, forcing it to suspend sales of investment certificates. The company has not reopened since, spurring anxiety among the Ohio residents who have purchased about $200 million in Fair certificates. In a press release on Friday, the company said it “still not determined when or if it will be able to resume regular business with regard to the sale and redemption of investment certificates."

In a late October investigative story, IBJ reported that since Durham bought Fair Finance from Donald Fair in 2002, he had used it almost like a personal bank to fund a range of business interests, some of them unsuccessful.

The story noted that Durham and related parties owed Fair more than $168 million, and it questioned whether the firm had the financial wherewithal to repay purchasers of investment certificates.

Dennis Ginty, a spokesman for the Division of Securities, said it will grant the 30-day extension.



  • Just Like Me!
    If Duram Stinks Like Me, and Talks Like Me- he will Probably be in Bankruptch, just like my many Trump-Named companies. Once a Snake- always a Snake! Bite Me Durham!
  • Just Like Me!
    If Duram Stinks Like Me, and Talks Like Me- he will Probably be in Bankruptch, just like my many Trump-Named companies. Once a Snake- always a Snake! Bite Me Durham!
  • F rating from Akron BBB
  • jim...
    Is that English? Hopefully you were drunk (at 5:41 in the evening) and not just stupid.
  • unfair finance
    ha! read the other that the bbb has got complaints from people saying fair is wanting there money,"payments" trying to increase many!! maybe they should tell durham that first
    • ...
      Ohio isn't going to let Durham issue another certificate in his lifetime. This episode has not just burned their regulators, it has scorched them and probably greatly narrowed the path for anyone ever hoping to raise money via investment certificates again.
    • One Born Every Minute
      Now let's just suppose Durham convinces Ohio to let him issue another round of certificates. Who is going to buy them?

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.