IBJNews

Fair Finance trustee finds lots of debts, few assets

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Greg Andrews

The deeper Fair Finance Co.’s bankruptcy trustee digs in his quest to unearth money, the bleaker the outlook appears for the company’s beleaguered investors.

For six months, an army of professionals has been trying to recover funds for the investors—5,000 largely blue-collar Ohioans who purchased more than $200 million in investment certificates with interest rates as high as 9.5 percent.

Regretfully, the investigators have discovered you can’t recover what isn’t there. They found that Indianapolis businessman Tim Durham, Fair’s co-owner and CEO, burned through staggering sums on a lavish lifestyle, loans and gifts to friends, and loans to businesses he partly owned that performed dismally.
 

Durham-Tim-mug Durham

“I would be surprised if we approached 25 cents on the dollar,” Cleveland attorney Kelly Burgan said of the potential recovery for investors.

This is the first time anyone associated with the investigation has provided a recovery estimate. Burgan, an attorney for bankruptcy Trustee Brian Bash, hopes she’s wrong, and she’s continuing to follow leads in hopes of unearthing more cash.

But here are a few examples of why the outlook is bleak:

• Durham’s Indianapolis-based leveraged-buyout firm, Obsidian Enterprises, owes Fair $31 million but apparently has no means to pay it back. It moved out of its offices on the top floor of downtown’s Chase Tower early this year because it couldn’t even pay its rent.

• Obsidian’s U.S. Rubber Reclaiming, a Vicksburg, Miss., firm that is the oldest rubber recycler in the United States, owes Fair $16 million, according to the bankruptcy trustee. Fair allowed U.S. Rubber to mortgage all its assets for a bank loan. The bank is attempting to sell the business, but because its property is contaminated and its equipment out of date, the best offer so far is just $200,000.

• Obsidian’s Danzer Industries, a Hagerstown, Md.-based maker of truck bodies and cargo trailers, went out of business in 2006 and has no assets with which to repay the $3.4 million it owes Fair.

• Durham spent $14 million on real estate and household expenses. Many of the properties have mortgages close to or exceeding the value of the real estate.

• Durham provided at least $16 million to friends and family in the form of gifts or loans. Many of the borrowers have little or no ability to pay the money back.

Through an attorney, Durham, 48, declined to comment. He has acknowledged owing lots of money to Fair but denied doing anything improper. In court papers, he argued that the risks of purchasing Fair’s unsecured investment certificates were fully disclosed in offering circulars provided to prospective investors.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Indianapolis launched a criminal investigation of Durham last fall. The probe continues, and officials won’t comment. But in a November court filing, they alleged Fair operated as a Ponzi scheme, using money from new investors to pay what it owed prior investors, thereby “lulling the earlier victims into believing that their money was being [handled] responsibly.”

Fair began doling out loans to insiders and related parties with abandon after Durham and fellow Indianapolis businessman Jim Cochran purchased it in 2002. Previously, Fair, which was founded in 1934, had stuck to its core business of purchasing consumer-finance contracts from retailers and other firms that extended credit to their customers.

That Durham and Obsidian ended up owning so many struggling businesses reflected his investment strategy—buy troubled companies, return them to profitability, and sell them for a tidy profit. As an LBO specialist, he relied heavily on borrowed money—a tactic that juiced potential returns but also boosted risk.

As Durham himself told IBJ in 2005, “This model works extraordinarily well in great times and extraordinarily badly in bad times.”

Durham launched Obsidian in 2000 after he and partners hit pay dirt on a couple of early deals. But he had trouble repeating that success. Nearly all the firms he scooped up in recent years appear to have fallen on even harder times.

“I have heard that he was in the turnaround market, but he doesn’t seem to have been very good at it,” Burgan said.

The economic meltdown didn’t help, of course. Joan SerVaas, Durham’s ex-wife, said she thinks Durham had hoped to keep his businesses afloat but found the downturn too much to withstand.

The couple divorced in 1999 but stay in touch. “He is not a bad person,” SerVaas said. “He feels terrible” and is doing what he can to cut investors’ losses.

But Burgan has seen plenty that makes her doubt Durham was on the up and up. For instance, when companies that received loans went out of business, he would assume the debt himself—a move that allowed Fair to avoid loan write-offs that might have sounded alarms with investors and regulators.

Burgan also noted that when Fair issued loans, it sometimes didn’t file public documents protecting its security interest. That allowed borrowers to take out more loans, and for those lenders to put themselves ahead of Fair for repayment.

“I don’t have any formal opinion, but it looks like a Ponzi scheme,” Burgan said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Fair Finance Investments?
    Glad to see TD invest FF jingle in the right things!!!
    http://www.playadelracing.com/sponsors/

    TD always wants to be a PLAYA
  • The Brizz
    Mark up another $50,000 in stolen money to Carl Brizzi. Yes, Brizzi served on that board, Yes Brizzi attended board meetings, Yes Brizzi is a Liar, Yes Brizzi remembers the $50,000 and No Brizzi will not return it. Unbelievable that this guy remains in office, he is a disgrace. The guy on that rant line on TV along time ago said it best. The only difference between Carl Brizzi and the slime that he prosecutes is that he hides behind the shield of his office and wears a suit. Carl Brizzi is a scumbag crook.
  • Mortgage fraud
    Keep in mind not only did Durham et al take the cash from Fair, they then remortgaged the assets, which scored millions more.

    Shelby Count Bank appears to be in the hook for a bunch. Someone should call their bank examiner and see how asleep at the wheel (or???) they were.

    As for Joan SerVaas, please, Joanie-- xplain why Timmy is living it up in a $100,000 a month rental in LA when he owns a 3.8million house down the street, that was also purchased with Fair victims money. The rental is unneeded and was secured only yo continue his pretend lifestyle.
  • wild speculation
    No idea about that wild speculation.

    It is too bad there was so much specualtion instead of a simple reading of the offering circulars.

    If Joan still thinks Tim is innocent, she must have very good reason. Hopefully she is right and the loan to Curtis is legitimate and will be repaid.
  • re
    that "loan" is, in my opinion ,a check Durham wrote for his alleged embezzlement of the Carpenter Industries retirement plan that allegedly led to Buert SerVaas canning him.

    Shame on all you fools who thought Durham was growing $1g bills in his backyard. He is a total dufus and if it weren't for the steller reporting of Greg Andrews and Cory Schouten, and a pesky whistleblower who never quit, Durham would have been approved for yet another $250M offering and he'd be sitting fat and happy in LA.

  • Joan sounds sick
    So is Joan planning to repay the $1 million loan Tim Durham claimed her company Curtis Publishing owes Fair?

    http://www.fuzzyaccounting.com/fairfinance/html/15_-_loans_by_borrower.html

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "bike lanes, specialized lighting, decorative signage, public art, grass medians, trees and rain gardens" These are all nice things to have, but can we freaking get the hundreds of potholes all over the city fixed first?!?!?!!?!?!

  2. When a criminal with multiple prior convictions serves five days of a one year sentence and later kills a police officer with a weapon illegally in his posession, residents of Boone County need to pay a tax to drive to work... PERFECT Progressive logic.. If, on the other hand, a fund were to be set up to build more prisons and hire more guards to keep the known criminals off the streets, I'd be the first to contribute.

  3. Not a word about how much the taxpayers will be ripped off on this deal. Crime spirals out of control and the the social problems that cause it go unheeded by an administration that does not give a rats behind about the welfare of our citizens. There is no money for police or plowing snow (remember last winter) or or or or, but spend on a sports complex, and the cash flows out of the taxpayers pockets. This city is SICK

  4. Sounds like a competitor just wanted to cause a problem. I would think as long as they are not "selling" the alcohol to the residents it is no different than if I serve wine to dinner guests. With all the violent crime happening I would think they should turn their attention to real criminals. Let these older residents enjoy what pleasures they can. Then again those boozed up residents may pose a danger to society.

  5. Where did the money go from the 2007 Income tax increase for public safety that the Mayor used to stir opposition and win the election and then failed to repeal (although he promised he would when he was running for election)? Where did the money go from the water utility sale? Where did the money go from the parking meter deal? Why does the money have all these funds for TIF deals and redevelopment of Mass avenue, and subsidy for luxury high rises, parking garages in Broad Ripple, and granola chain grocery stores but can not find the money to take care of public safety. Commuters shouldn't have to pay the tax of failed leadership in Marion County by leaders that commuters have no say in electing. Taxation without representation.

ADVERTISEMENT