IBJNews

Federal agents raid University Loft headquarters

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Federal agents on Tuesday raided the headquarters of University Loft in Hancock County, spending hours at the contract-furniture maker seizing records.

Agencies involved included the Department of Defense, the Air Force, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The agents were executing a sealed search warrant, said Mary Bippus, spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Tim Morrison. She would not disclose the contents of the warrant.

No arrests were made, Bippus said.

The company last year was awarded a multi-million-dollar contract to supply metal furniture for the Marine Corps’ Camp Lejeune base in North Carolina.

CEO James Jannetides was not immediately available for comment.

In a written statement issued Tuesday, University Loft said: “Our company was approached by federal agents with a search warrant seeking business records. The government did not reveal to us the object of their search, but we are cooperating with them in every way requested and will continue to do so. University Loft is confident it is in compliance with all applicable laws.”

Jannetides founded University Loft in 1986. Four years ago, it built a $22 million, 508,000-square-foot headquarters in the Hancock County town of Mount Comfort.

It’s not clear how many employees the company has in Mount Comfort. University Loft added 30 workers last year to fulfill the Marine contract.

This is not the first time University Loft has been investigated by the federal government. A year ago, the company agreed to pay $400,000 following an investigation by the U.S. Justice Department alleging the company violated trade agreements. The Justice Department said the settlement resolved allegations that the company knowingly sold Malaysian-made furniture to government agencies, which violated the Trade Agreements Act.

To strengthen government trade policy, the act sets requirements for the country of origin selling products to the United States. University Loft failed to comply with the rules under contracts it received from the General Services Administration that allowed it to sell to the military and other government entities, the Justice Department said.

University Loft issued a prepared statement at the time saying it "disputed the claims and concluded that it had at all times acted in good faith and engaged in no wrongdoing." However, the company said it "determined that it was more cost-effective to settle the case than litigate it."

The settlement followed a federal investigation of alleged false claims and contract fraud against University Loft brought in a lawsuit by California competitor Furniture by Thurston Inc. Furniture by Thurston received a $66,000 share of the recovery.

Under the False Claims Act, private citizens can bring a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery obtained by the government.

The case was investigated as part of the National Procurement Fraud Initiative. The government formed the National Procurement Fraud Task Force in 2006 to promote the early detection and prosecution of procurement fraud associated with the increase in government contracting activity, particularly for national security programs.

In its statement, University Loft said the primary issue in the case was whether it was permitted under the Trade Agreements Act to ship furniture directly from Malaysia to overseas U.S. military bases. The company said government contracting officials authorized and requested such shipments to save shipping costs. However, the Justice Departments said the practice violated the trade act even if it was requested by government officials.


 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT