Feds criticize Indiana education program for migrant children

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana never spent millions of dollars the federal government provided to help make sure the children of migrant workers get a good education, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Education.

The federal government awarded the state a total of about $12 million for fiscal years 2010 and 2011, but the Indiana Department of Education didn't claim the grants, the report obtained this week by The Associated Press says.

Federal officials who reviewed Indiana's program in March expressed concern in the report that the state wasn't spending enough to ensure that migrant children receive adequate schooling in spite of their families' frequent moves.

A state's ability to serve migrant children "is directly related to the extent to which it can fully and effectively implement the requirements of the program and expend MEP fund," the report said. "Knowing this, [the Education Department] is very concerned about IDOE's failure to comply with a number of MEP requirements and its inability to expend MEP funds in accordance with the 27-month window of availability."

The report said Indiana has downsized the staff for finding children for the program so much that the state can no longer do the job. The state program has a staff of four and employs five seasonal workers to recruit children for the program. Federal officials recommended the program hire additional staff.

State Department of Education spokeswoman Stephanie Sample said Wednesday that Indiana received about $22.7 million for the years 2007 to 2009, and returned about $3.9 million. The rest was spent on migrant programs, she said. She said the reason the state didn't spend all the grant money was that the award is based on the number of migrant students in 2001, when the state had many more.

"There is no flexibility in how the funds are used. Any funding the state does not use to support education for migrant families goes back to the federal treasury," Sample said in an email.

School districts apply for the money and are reimbursed by the state with grant funds, Sample said.

She said migrant families tend to stay in Indiana from April through September or October, which "makes them hard to track, because they aren't in our state during the traditional school year."

About 73 percent of the families migrate from Texas, Georgia and Florida, and most of the remainder come from Mexico, the report said. Migrant families often work in fields growing corn, tomatoes, apples, watermelon, asparagus and cucumbers.

The report said the number of children eligible for Indiana's program has dwindled from 7,000 to 1,000 since 2007, a decline the state believes resulted from employers hiring workers without families or local seasonal workers, families settling, the lingering economic downturn and increased enforcement of immigration laws.

The Sept. 28 report also said the state needs to improve the program's plan and other documentation and should take steps to make sure migrant children were counted correctly. The report said state education officials rely too heavily on schools' counts, which include only children who are already enrolled and miss those who don't already go to school.

The U.S. Department of Education told the state to take corrective measures within 75 days. Sample said that response is due by Dec. 28, and the state expects to meet that deadline. Without corrective measures, the federal department said it might place conditions on the state's 2013 grant.

Another state spokeswoman, Katie Stephens, said Indiana's education agency is working with the federal government and other Midwestern states to develop a more efficient program.

"While the state has not misused the funds, we are committed to ensuring faster allocation of resources to our migrant families who need them," she said.


  • Legal?
    Why is that your concern? Your concern should be if these children are receiving the right education. Fair education, equal education. THEY ARE CHILDREN!!! CHILDREN. Why is Legal or Non Legal the importance?
    Tax money is all you think about? Legal or not legal? Is that a concern? Well have you ever wonder how many tax dollars the government keeps from all of the "Undocumented" people out there who work jobs that MANY U.S CITEZENS will not dare to do because of the pay, difficulty, location ,etc. Oh most important because many U.S citizens are just looking for jobs with benefits. Benefits that many Undocumented cannot receive and honestly do not care for. Why? Because they come into this country for a better future. But they are all judged due to bad reputation of Drug cartels and drug smugglers that all the American think they are all the same. Just like what happened with the Arabs, Muslims etc. 911 Happened and now everyone who looks like one. Americans think they are terrorist. Seriously.
  • Eliminate Federal DOE
    The real issue here isn't whether these migrants are legal or not - that is secondary. The real issue here is the Fed DOE 'granting' money to states, which of course puts the state on the hook to perform whatever the DOE wants. Eliminate the DOE and return those budget dollars to the respective states from where they came, and gee golly -- the state suddenly has a huge bucket o' change (the state's own money to begin with) to use as it wishes to educate these migrant kids at the appropriate levels (and any other program the state's *voters* deem important enough to fund with tax dollars).
  • $$$
    I would guess that the majority of these families are here illegally - the federal govt can't seem to waste taxpayer dollars fast enough
    • ???????
      Are they legal or illeagal.?

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

      2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

      3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

      4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

      5. Oh wait. Never mind.