IBJNews

Feds reject Indiana request for health care exemption

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana consumers who buy their own health insurance will get a bigger bang for their buck in the next few years, thanks to a decision by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Monday.

The federal agency rejected Indiana's bid for an exemption from federal health care overhaul rules that require insurers selling policies to individuals to essentially dedicate 80 percent of the premiums they collect to medical care. In other words, business costs and profits cannot total more than 20 percent of the premiums the insurers collect, or else they must pay rebates to policyholders the following year.

The Indiana Department of Insurance, arguing the 80 percent rule was discouraging insurers from selling individual policies, requested permission to allow the companies to devote just 65 percent of premiums to medical care this year, about 69 percent next year, 72 percent in 2013 and 76 percent in 2014.

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels condemned the HHS decision.

"Once again, the Obama administration took a position in favor of higher health care costs and against personal freedom," Daniels said in a statement issued by his office.

The Insurance Department, in requesting the exemption, cited five carriers leaving the state's individual market since July 2010.

However, Gary Cohen, acting director of the Office of Oversight at HHS' Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told reporters in a teleconference Monday that Aetna, Cigna, Pekin and two other companies got out of the market for reasons other than the 80 percent rule or that the departures would not make individual policies harder to get or more expensive in Indiana.

Logan Harrison, Indiana's deputy insurance commissioner for health compliance, disagreed.

"Anytime there's less choice in the marketplace, consumers are adversely affected," Harrison said in a telephone interview.

David Roos, a public health insurance advocate with Covering Kids and Families of Indiana, said insurance companies pressed the state for relief from the 80 percent rule during legislative hearings this past summer.

However, Roos said Indiana was among the first states to hold insurers "to a higher standard" when the Daniels administration, in designing the Healthy Indiana Plan medical savings account, required insurers to return not just 80 percent but 85 percent of premium dollars in medical care. Daniels is seeking federal approval to use the Healthy Indiana Plan to enroll newly eligible people in Medicaid beginning in 2014.

Indianapolis-based Anthem dominates Indiana's health insurance market for individuals with a 65 percent share, Insurance Department officials said this summer. The state's Medicaid actuary, Milliman Inc., has said Anthem and four other companies control 90 percent of the market.

However, consumer advocates say the exodus of Aetna and other companies might result in fewer choices and higher costs for consumers under health insurance exchanges to be established in 2014 under the health care overhaul. The exchanges will pool the resources of large groups of people to offer more affordable health insurance.

About 200,000 Indiana residents now have individual polices rather than employer-provided coverage. About 875,000 have no insurance at all.

Indiana and three other states have had requests for exemptions denied by HHS but several other states including Kentucky have won them. Seven other states have requests pending.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • politics at its best
    Wow - this article really showcases Republican disdain for anything good out of PPACA.

    Logan Harrison: "Anytime there's less choice in the marketplace, consumers are adversely affected" yet Indiana allows Anthem to control 65% of market and sides with Anthem in all disputes.

    Daniels criticizes the decision but wants HIP to be the vehicle for Indiana that requires 85%!

    Indiana really wants an insurance company to have 35% of the premium dollar go to insurance company costs and profits?

    Unbelievable
  • Ok for Daniels but not for Obama?
    So how is it ok for Daniels' Healthy Indiana Plan to require insurers to return 85 percent or premiums in medical care but he accuses Obama of causing higher health care costs by requiring 80 percent?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

ADVERTISEMENT