IBJNews

FEIGENBAUM: Indiana General Assembly will be known for trading paint

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

feigenbaumThe good news is that nothing absolutely essential must pass during the 2012 General Assembly session. Lawmakers put biennial budget and decennial redistricting responsibilities behind them when they adjourned in the spring.

The bad news is that nothing that many Hoosiers would like to see accomplished may win passage in 2012 if the more dire predictions come to fruition about the tension over the overarching issue, right-to-work legislation.

The right-to-work issue is the sine qua non of the Republican legislative agenda, setting up an epic battle between the irresistible force that legislative Republicans constitute by numbers (and perhaps popular support) and the immovable object in the form of House and Senate Democrats, intransigent on the issue.

House Democratic Leader Pat Bauer, D-South Bend, has been creative in using and skirting legislative rules and customs in the past decade, and he is inscrutable as ever over what tactics his caucus might deploy.

While a full-fledged walkout or boycott should be off the table due to a punitive fine framework, expect briefer periods where Democrats may absent themselves from a House quorum—speculation centers on a regular “one day on, two days off” Democratic House regimen once right-to-work surfaces—and caucuses should last longer than usual on many occasions on both sides of the Rotunda.

Expect scores of Democratic amendments, particularly if right-to-work hits the House floor. They view their ability to make floor speeches as a key tool to “educate” Hoosiers on the details and the bigger economic picture, and their contention that this is another chapter in a GOP plot to cripple organized labor and the Democratic Party.

Democrats also know there are no mission-critical bills this short session, so if they somehow kill the session or force postponement of assorted unrelated matters for another year, it would be hard to portray them as sinking vital legislation that can’t wait until 2013.

And there are many issues traversing assorted realms that you can expect to be raised if this were to be an ordinary session.

The push for a statewide workplace smoking ban will be resuscitated, perhaps boosted by additional local ordinances. Circumstances seem to be lining up for consideration of a land-based casino for Gary (and perhaps the other riverboat communities), and lawmakers will look to recoup some $30 million annually in racino taxes struck down by a federal bankruptcy court in Delaware.

Consensus grows for local government reforms focused on nepotism and barring government employees from serving on local legislative bodies. After an apparent 2011 pre-session agreement on sentencing reform collapsed over the details, summer study helped iron out some kinks, and there will be a legislative response to the Supreme Court ruling on resisting an unlawful law enforcement entry into a home.

Drug-testing for recipients of certain state assistance programs will prove controversial, and even as Congress fiddles on the issue, Sens. Greg Walker, R- Columbus, and John Broden, D-South Bend, are burning to do something about helping Indiana collect sales taxes from online purchases.

House Democrats will push an agenda that includes directing a share of state unemployment benefits to workers whose hours are reduced by employers seeking to avoid larger layoffs, recharging the Small Business Loan Program with a $20 million infusion, and requiring contractors to employ more Indiana workers on public projects.

They advocate a voucher program to help low-income children afford preschool. They also want to fully fund full-day kindergarten, offer tax deductions for educational expenses, enact a sales tax holiday for school supplies, impose graduated caps on elementary school classroom sizes, and establish a scholarship program to encourage students to become teachers.

A carefully crafted, coordinated and expensive multi-county mass transit package will be a centerpiece, and bridge maintenance and utility-related environmental and expense issues will be discussed.

Lawmakers will also consider tweaking school reform measures, fine-tuning some voucher and school takeover program issues that arose in implementation. Solons will also likely fix some problematic new language intended to afford local vendors an edge in bidding for government purchases, but which resulted in unintended consequences. Ditto for loopholes in a new law that was to have outlawed the sale of products that were essentially synthetic marijuana and cocaine.

Changes are also in store for a new election law provision that removed unopposed candidates from the ballot, and satellite voting procedures continue to be reviewed.

Scores of other bills will be introduced and debated as the Super Bowl festivities approach, but just like the “oh-fer” start of the Indianapolis Colts dashed hopes that the Colts would be playing in February, right-to-work may also suck all the air out of the Statehouse, leaving other issues as an afterthought—or on the sidelines.•
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT