A few hundred union protesters were on hand Friday morning for a public hearing before Indiana legislators on a divisive
labor bill that's prompted a two-day standstill in the Indiana House.
The Senate and House labor committees are holding a joint hearing on the proposal to prohibit contracts between companies
and labor unions that require workers to pay mandatory representation fees.
Republicans have set aside four hours for the hearing, after which the Senate committee is expected to vote.
Supporters of the bill say it would make the state more attractive to employers, while opponents maintain it is an attack
on unions and would drive down wages.
Protesters were quiet during the hearing, but some held signs with sayings such as "Stop the war on workers."
During the hearing, Republican Sen. Brent Waltz of Greenwood asked the president of the Oklahoma chamber of commerce whether
the energy industry had a greater impact on that state's economic health than its adoption of a right-to-work law in 2001.
Waltz says he wasn't convinced about the law's economic sway.
The Oklahoma official told the labor committees that the law gives his state a competitive advantage over Indiana in attracting
new businesses.
House Democrats are bracing for major financial pain as they begin a third day blocking a bill that would make Indiana the
first state in more than a decade to enact right-to-work legislation.
Fines of $1,000 daily for each Democrat could hit Friday, depending on what Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma decides
to do with lawmakers who deny him the numbers needed to push through the Republican priority.
But Rep. Vanessa Summers, D-Indianapolis, said that if she can stand on principle against the labor bill and fines that could
reach into the tens of thousands of dollars, other Democrats can, too.
"I'll be the main one to say 'I cannot stand the fine,'" she said Thursday as Democrats strategized
in a private meeting at the Statehouse. "I'm a single mother, I have a son in college, I'm moving in with my
mother, but I'm on the right side of history. So whatever happens is going to bless me."
Democrats stalled business Wednesday, the first day of the 2012 session, when they did not report to the House floor. They
continued Thursday to block action on a right-to-work measure that would bar private unions from collecting mandatory fees.
Republican leaders planned a joint hearing Friday to weigh the measure and Senate lawmakers were prepared to take an initial
vote on the measure afterward.
Inside the 40-member caucus, lawmakers are split over how much they can afford to keep stalling in order to block the bill.
Some strode out of Thursday's caucus meeting saying that if they suffered through last year's five-week stay in Urbana,
Ill., they can stand on principle now.
But others said new $1,000-a-day fines established by Republicans after last year's walkout have raised the stakes much
higher than some can afford.
"Last year they were taking my bank account, this year they're taking my home," said Rep. David Cheatham, D-North
Vernon. Cheatham was one of three Democrats who has joined Republicans in the House chamber each day. They say they oppose
the right-to-work measure but don't agree with the stall tactics.
House Democratic Leader Patrick Bauer said Thursday that Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma told him in a private meeting
he would begin fining Democrats on Friday.
"It's a significant issue. We think it's another assault against free speech," Bauer said as he walked
into the House Democratic caucus meeting.
But Bosma said he had not decided whether to begin implementing the fines Friday and that no legal paperwork had been started.
"We're just counting on folks having some common sense and showing up for work eventually," Bosma said.
Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis, joined the three Democrats on Thursday for a quorum vote that placed Republicans very close
to getting the numbers they need to push the bill forward. He said he is asking Republicans to give them more public hearings
on the issue.
He also noted there is little Democrats can do to stop the measure.
"That's the quandary, and we have to decide: What we can we do?" DeLaney said. "We have limited resources
and we have a limited number of votes."
National right-to-work advocates say they see Indiana as their best shot at passing the labor bill into law. Despite a slate
of statehouse wins across the nation in 2010, Republicans have been unable to move the measure yet. They came closest in New
Hampshire, but lawmakers could not find the votes to overturn Democratic Gov. John Lynch's veto.
Bauer and other Democrats would not say Thursday how long they planned to stall. Instead, Bauer said, they plan to hold public
hearings on the proposal around the state as soon as this weekend. The first hearings could happen in Fort Wayne and Evansville.
The new law levies a fine of $1,000 per day against each lawmaker who sits out more than three days in a row. Republicans
established the new penalties after Democrats left the state last year to block the right-to-work measure.
The House Democratic caucus meanwhile opened an account on the Democratic fundraising website ActBlue and sent out an appeal
Wednesday on Facebook seeking donations of between $5 and $250. "The Indiana House Democrats NEED YOUR HELP! Please support
our caucus as we fight another battle against the Republicans as they try to push RTW legislation through without listening
to working Hoosiers," the Democrats wrote in their appeal.
Indiana Democratic Party spokeswoman Jennifer Wagner said her group did not pay for any of the penalties accrued last year
and did not plan to pay any fines this year.
A lawsuit challenging fines from last year's session filed by Rep. Bill Crawford, D-Indianapolis, is still being weighed
by a Marion County Superior Court judge.

















IBJ Conversations
33 Comments
Add Comment
Buildings don't just build themselves because I show up. The lights don't just come on because I walk in. I read forums like these and all I ever see is people bash unions and how lazy we all supposedly are, and I cant do anything but chuckle. Most of you are filled with ignorant hatred and jealously. Do a little research before you spew your anti union rhetoric.
Right to work is about 1 thing. If you take the money out of unions hands, then Democrats lose the biggest financial backer. This is only about politics. If the democrats have no money, and republicans have unlimited funds provided by business, then republicans win elections.
And the law will not prevent unions from forming in companies nor will it prevent workers from signing on to a union if that is their choice. And part of this issue is the way unions have operated, just like big companies that got "too big to fail" so have some unions. They need smart effective courageous leaders, not bloated old school idealists who refuse to change to meet the needs of the times.
I wonder if Bauer requires that ALL Ivy Tech employees be unionized?
Look at Anderson, Marion, Kokomo, etc... What did the unions give those people?
The unions turned "made in America" into "Assembled in America".
What a great lesson the Democrats are teaching our kids. "If you can't win, run away" Just like Obama said, Elections have concequences.
The UAW ultimately killed Anderson. It chokes me up to see what a depressed, desolate place it has become. The UAW convinced people that the union protection was all they needed -- no need for higher education. Now those that still live there are unemployable. The schools are among the worst in the state. People who do find work there live in Fishers, or Pendleton, or somewhere else -- and reverse commute, so their kids at least have a chance to rise above mediocrity (not that they all do). Ask yourself how much money the UAW spends on scholarships.
My parents and grandparents should have seen it comin'...artificially high wages, poor education and no risk of being fired are a bad formula. The auto workers were first to go. Now it's the teachers that are being let go. You can't blame that on bad management or low-wage foreign competition.
As I understand it, employees could either opt to join the union and receive union wages or opt not to join the union and receive non-union wages. Assuming that is the crux of the matter, wouldn't it follow that those who valued the benefit the union provides would pay dues and receive the higher wages while those who didn't think the union's value was worth dues, would take the lower non-union wages.
Seems that everyone would have the choice to do what was right for them. What am I missing?
I guess, in an ideal world, the labor unions would simply pull their heads out of their arses and negotiate reasonable benefit and wage packages instead of driving companies out of business. In return, I wish companies who agree to things like pensions would fund them properly instead of planning on funding them from future profits like some pyramid scheme.
A website opposing Right To Work can be found at http://indianarighttowork.com/.
Let's talk benefits. The benefits of a right to work state is that more companies would consider Indiana as a place to put a company and would allow us to keep more.
Dana, Borg-Warner, GM Stamping, Ford, Federal Mogul, Gencorp, Delphi, Visteon all moved from Indiana to non-union states or countries...all because Union leadership is stubborn and refused to understand the reality of the markets.
Unions had a place when the Cretins were making boys dig coal mines, but that was 75 yrs ago. We were a regional market and not a world market at that point. Things change and the Unions refuse to bend with these changes.
The UAW decided it would be better to let GM Stamping close its doors rather than make concessions to keep hundreds working. Who exactly are they protecting?
I'm sorry the world changed and the Unions ignored the way things work now. I'm even more sorry their leadership led them to ignore these changes and fight even harder against change. It's time the Unions tell their members they're sorry for these mistakes and make changes to work with the companies that provide the jobs.
Think about this for a minute...the only jobs Unions ever provided were for the leadership that has put their memebership at an all time low and cost their own people thousands of jobs.
Indiana native Jim Jones had a plan to protect his people and they all died from cyanide poisoning because they blindly followed his lunacy. Time to open your Union eyes, Pat Bauer is mixing the Kool-Aid as we speak.
"If an opposing faction walks out and refuses to debate or vote on proposed legislation, then the requirements for a quorum do not need to be met."
Maybe this will make them work.
Can you imagine what Democrats would be saying if the Republican party did this kind of thing?
This temper tantrum he is leading is just as ridiculous, does nothing to solve the problem, only draws attention to himself and just as fake as the hair on his fat little head.
I think it was Obama who has famously said that elections have consequences...so unless they can win more seats, they need to get to work.
That a Business or Corporation.
Will not Locate in Indiana is Wrong.
Right To Work.
Is about corporations deliberately Driving Down wage's
Healthcare And Retirement Pension's..
And under Mining the American Economy.For the sake of a Short-Term Profit..
This Bill will not only effect a Major Corporation. But as well any business or company that are represented with any Union..
It's just in time for the Super Bowl and makes me wonder why They have not Attacked the Colt's or Pacer's because you see they to are unionized.....
Hey, in my job, if I hold out and don't go to work, I get fired. Folks, are we ready to fire Speaker Bauer and the rest of his lap dog minions?