IBJNews

Filing: Roche considered leaving Indy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s hard to believe now, but as recently as two years ago, Indianapolis was close to losing its 15th-largest employer. Roche Diagnostics Corp. was looking seriously at moving its 2,900-employee North American headquarters out of Indianapolis.

Such a development would have been disastrous for Indianapolis’ economy, which reached unemployment levels this year not seen since 2003. It also wouldn’t have helped the budding life sciences economy here, of which Roche is a key anchor.

The possible relocation was confirmed by documents filed in the court battle between Marsh Supermarkets Inc. and Roche over a sublease deal Roche welched on three years ago. A Hamilton County judge on Dec. 19 ordered Roche to pay Marsh $19.5 million in damages for backing out of its deal to lease the Marsh headquarters along Interstate 69 near 96th Street.

Roche officials said they would appeal the decision by Judge William Hughes.

“Roche’s corporate policy is to conduct business in a fair and ethical manner and the company believes it was acting in accordance with the terms of the contract when it terminated the sublease,” spokeswoman Betsy Cox said in an e-mail.

Big changes were afoot at Roche when it canceled the sublease deal in 2008. On May 5, 2008, the company said it would transfer 300 local jobs to Germany. Later that month, North American CEO Tiffany Olson resigned abruptly. Roche’s Asia-Pacific chief, Michael Tillmann, took over the local post about a week before the firm told Marsh it was pulling out of the deal.

Tillmann wanted to terminate the agreement with Marsh to give the company more flexibility if he decided to move Roche out of Indianapolis, according to court documents.

Switzerland-based Roche, which has both a pharmaceutical and diagnostic business, had at the time agreed to acquire South San Francisco-based Genentech Inc. Since Roche Diagnostics already had operations in Pleasanton, Calif., Roche officials wondered if it wouldn’t make more sense to centralize its operations in the Golden State.

One other option would have been to move the Indianapolis headquarters to New Jersey, where Roche also has significant pharmaceutical operations.

That evaluation process continued throughout 2009, as Roche closed its $46 billion purchase of Genentech. In December 2009, current and former employees and contractors at Roche told IBJ the company was evaluating all its locations around the globe, including Indianapolis.

The possibilities included a massive exodus from Indianapolis, where Roche oversees all North American sales operations of its lab analyzers and other diagnostic devices. Roche also operates manufacturing plants here that make components of its blood glucose monitors.

Or the changes could have been more modest, perhaps involving a move of research and development jobs to California or, alternatively, moving information technology workers from New Jersey to Indianapolis.

That analysis continued even after Tillmann’s resignation in January 2010. His replacement, Jack Phillips, ultimately decided to keep Roche Diagnostics' headquarters in Indianapolis.

In fact, Phillips has even been behind a modest expansion of Roche’s Indianapolis presence. The company built out one of its manufacturing plants that makes test strips for its glucose meters, creating work for more than 50 new employees.

Also, Roche selected Indianapolis as the location of a new human resources center, which handles payroll work for both diagnostic and pharmaceutical staff. The center added 50 jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT