IBJNews

Filing: Roche considered leaving Indy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s hard to believe now, but as recently as two years ago, Indianapolis was close to losing its 15th-largest employer. Roche Diagnostics Corp. was looking seriously at moving its 2,900-employee North American headquarters out of Indianapolis.

Such a development would have been disastrous for Indianapolis’ economy, which reached unemployment levels this year not seen since 2003. It also wouldn’t have helped the budding life sciences economy here, of which Roche is a key anchor.

The possible relocation was confirmed by documents filed in the court battle between Marsh Supermarkets Inc. and Roche over a sublease deal Roche welched on three years ago. A Hamilton County judge on Dec. 19 ordered Roche to pay Marsh $19.5 million in damages for backing out of its deal to lease the Marsh headquarters along Interstate 69 near 96th Street.

Roche officials said they would appeal the decision by Judge William Hughes.

“Roche’s corporate policy is to conduct business in a fair and ethical manner and the company believes it was acting in accordance with the terms of the contract when it terminated the sublease,” spokeswoman Betsy Cox said in an e-mail.

Big changes were afoot at Roche when it canceled the sublease deal in 2008. On May 5, 2008, the company said it would transfer 300 local jobs to Germany. Later that month, North American CEO Tiffany Olson resigned abruptly. Roche’s Asia-Pacific chief, Michael Tillmann, took over the local post about a week before the firm told Marsh it was pulling out of the deal.

Tillmann wanted to terminate the agreement with Marsh to give the company more flexibility if he decided to move Roche out of Indianapolis, according to court documents.

Switzerland-based Roche, which has both a pharmaceutical and diagnostic business, had at the time agreed to acquire South San Francisco-based Genentech Inc. Since Roche Diagnostics already had operations in Pleasanton, Calif., Roche officials wondered if it wouldn’t make more sense to centralize its operations in the Golden State.

One other option would have been to move the Indianapolis headquarters to New Jersey, where Roche also has significant pharmaceutical operations.

That evaluation process continued throughout 2009, as Roche closed its $46 billion purchase of Genentech. In December 2009, current and former employees and contractors at Roche told IBJ the company was evaluating all its locations around the globe, including Indianapolis.

The possibilities included a massive exodus from Indianapolis, where Roche oversees all North American sales operations of its lab analyzers and other diagnostic devices. Roche also operates manufacturing plants here that make components of its blood glucose monitors.

Or the changes could have been more modest, perhaps involving a move of research and development jobs to California or, alternatively, moving information technology workers from New Jersey to Indianapolis.

That analysis continued even after Tillmann’s resignation in January 2010. His replacement, Jack Phillips, ultimately decided to keep Roche Diagnostics' headquarters in Indianapolis.

In fact, Phillips has even been behind a modest expansion of Roche’s Indianapolis presence. The company built out one of its manufacturing plants that makes test strips for its glucose meters, creating work for more than 50 new employees.

Also, Roche selected Indianapolis as the location of a new human resources center, which handles payroll work for both diagnostic and pharmaceutical staff. The center added 50 jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT