IBJNews

Financier in botched deal sues Emmis over loan to Smulyan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The financier that once backed Emmis Communications Corp. CEO Jeff Smulyan’s attempt to take Emmis private is making good on its promise to sue the company and its board of directors for using company money to fund Smulyan’s lawsuit against the financier.

In uncommonly sharp language, attorneys for New York-based Alden Global Capital accused the Emmis board of “a blatantly self-dealing transaction” that allows Smulyan to “pursue a personal litigation vendetta” against Alden. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of all shareholders, accuses the Emmis board of breaching its duties to shareholders and also of violating the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Alden’s lawsuit, filed Wednesday in a state court in New York, concerns a loan of up to $200,000 that Emmis’ board approved in December to help Smulyan pay legal expenses in a separate lawsuit pending against Alden in federal court in Indianapolis.

That lawsuit, filed in September by a Smulyan-controlled entity called JS Acquisition LLC, accuses Alden of breach of contract for backing out of its agreement to finance JS Acquisition’s $90 million buyout of all Emmis’ publicly traded shares. Alden cited a “precipitous” drop in the value of radio assets.

Kate Snedeker, a spokeswoman for Indianapolis-based Emmis, wrote Friday in an e-mail that the company believes Alden’s lawsuit is without merit. In response to Alden’s Feb. 3 letter, she wrote, “We’re confident with the board’s position on the issue, and we have equal confidence in the outcome.”

Alden threatened to sue Emmis over the $200,000 loan in a Feb. 3 letter unless the Emmis board rescinded the loan and immediately took steps to recover any funds already paid out and spent. Alden demanded a response by Feb. 11 or else said it would sue.

Alden, in its lawsuit, says it reiterated its demands in another letter on Feb. 9. In response to both letters, Emmis General Counsel Scott Enright replied by saying the matters would be considered by the Emmis board at its next scheduled meeting.

Now Alden is asking a judge to satisfy its demands, including issuing injunctions to prevent the Emmis board from transferring any funds to Smulyan and to prevent Smulyan’s JS Acquisition from spending any of the money.

“It is almost certainly because Smulyan could not obtain traditional funding for this extraordinarily risky venture that he elected to raid the coffers of Emmis—a company that is currently so cash-strapped that it has publicly disclosed that it may not be able to meet its upcoming financial covenants and debt obligations,” wrote Alden attorneys Judith Archer and Michael Swartzendruber in the lawsuit.

They added, “The directors’ decision to illegally funnel money to Emmis’s CEO in the midst of a liquidity crisis represents the sine qua non of irresponsibility and disloyalty.”

Emmis' liquidity crisis stems from looming debt obligations. On Jan. 11, the company disclosed in a securities filing that it has enough cash to get through the end of February, but made no promises for after that. It also disclosed that on Sept. 1, Emmis' debt obligations will be more restrictive, further pinching company finances.

If Emmis fails to meet those more restrictive terms, it would default on its $345 million in senior bank debt, causing it to come due more rapidly.

Emmis has said it is pursuing sales of radio stations in New York and Chicago to raise cash to meet the stricter debt terms.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Emmis owns more than 20 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in several cities, including Indianapolis Monthly.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT