IBJNews

Emmis decision to pay CEO legal fees illegal, financier says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Emmis Communications Corp.’s decision to pay some of CEO Jeff Smulyan’s legal fees in a lawsuit arising from his failed bid to take the company private is illegal, charges the financier who backed out of the deal.

New York-based Alden Global Capital informed Emmis directors Thursday by letter that the company’s $200,000 loan toward Smulyan’s breach-of-contract suit against Alden violates the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Alden is demanding, on behalf of Emmis and its shareholders, that directors immediately revoke the loan and recover any proceeds that may have been distributed.

If the loan is not rescinded by close of business on Feb. 11, Alden said, it will pursue legal action.

Emmis’ board unanimously approved the expenditure Dec. 24, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If the litigation is successful, the company will be repaid $300,000 from any financial recovery.

Emmis filed the breach-of-contract lawsuit in September against three Alden Global Capital units that backed out of the going-private deal.

JS Acquisition LLC, the company Smulyan formed to take Emmis private, says the transaction failed when Alden changed course after months of negotiations with a group of preferred shareholders, costing the company $10.2 million in fees and other expenses.

Alden and JS Acquisition agreed in April to help take Emmis private. But, in July, nine dissident investors—holding a combined 38 percent of the company’s preferred shares—emerged to block the $90 million deal.

Alden ultimately pulled out of the transaction, citing a “precipitous” drop in radio-industry assets.

Emmis shares opened Monday morning at $1.06 each, down from a 52-week high of $2.45 reached when the deal to take the company private was announced in April.

Shares late last month rebounded above a $1 threshold the company needs to maintain to avoid delisting on the NASDAQ exchange. Emmis shares have closed above $1 for six consecutive business days and need to stay above the amount for 10 days before May 2 to avoid delisting.

Alden touched upon Emmis’ shaky financial status in its letter to directors.

“Given the apparent dire financial situation Emmis faces, the Board’s decision to loan [Smulyan] a portion of the Company’s remaining cash, which at the very best will not be recovered until the end of protracted litigation, has subjected the Company to imminent injury beyond just the loss of the illegally loaned funds,” a lawyer for Alden wrote.

A spokeswoman for Emmis, however, maintains the loan was “well-vetted” by directors and company lawyers.

“We're confident with the Board's position on the issue, and have equal confidence in the outcome,” spokeswoman Kate Snedeker said via e-mail.

Alden insists the loan violates a section of Sarbanes-Oxley that it says prevents executives of public corporations from exploiting their relationships with directors to make a company a lender of last resort.

Further, the loan violates disclosure laws, Alden argued, because Emmis failed to list it as “compensation” to Smulyan.

“We searched Emmis’ public disclosures in vain for rationale justifying handing Mr. Smulyan a hidden bonus for use in pursuing dubious claims against one of Emmis’ most significant shareholders,” Alden’s letter said.

The breach-of-contract suit JS Acquisition brought against Alden is pending in federal court in Indianapolis.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Emmis owns more than 20 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in numerous cities, including Indianapolis Monthly.
 


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Can't agree with you
    I'm not sure I can agree with you. The article states the money was a 'loan' from the company, which makes it seem like it was have to be repaid. Not sure how Alden could say this was a bonus given that it was a loan.
  • Abuse of power
    Alden is correct in their position. Jeff Smulyan can well afford the attorneys. He is exerting his influence on the board he appointed.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT