Emmis decision to pay CEO legal fees illegal, financier says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp.’s decision to pay some of CEO Jeff Smulyan’s legal fees in a lawsuit arising from his failed bid to take the company private is illegal, charges the financier who backed out of the deal.

New York-based Alden Global Capital informed Emmis directors Thursday by letter that the company’s $200,000 loan toward Smulyan’s breach-of-contract suit against Alden violates the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Alden is demanding, on behalf of Emmis and its shareholders, that directors immediately revoke the loan and recover any proceeds that may have been distributed.

If the loan is not rescinded by close of business on Feb. 11, Alden said, it will pursue legal action.

Emmis’ board unanimously approved the expenditure Dec. 24, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If the litigation is successful, the company will be repaid $300,000 from any financial recovery.

Emmis filed the breach-of-contract lawsuit in September against three Alden Global Capital units that backed out of the going-private deal.

JS Acquisition LLC, the company Smulyan formed to take Emmis private, says the transaction failed when Alden changed course after months of negotiations with a group of preferred shareholders, costing the company $10.2 million in fees and other expenses.

Alden and JS Acquisition agreed in April to help take Emmis private. But, in July, nine dissident investors—holding a combined 38 percent of the company’s preferred shares—emerged to block the $90 million deal.

Alden ultimately pulled out of the transaction, citing a “precipitous” drop in radio-industry assets.

Emmis shares opened Monday morning at $1.06 each, down from a 52-week high of $2.45 reached when the deal to take the company private was announced in April.

Shares late last month rebounded above a $1 threshold the company needs to maintain to avoid delisting on the NASDAQ exchange. Emmis shares have closed above $1 for six consecutive business days and need to stay above the amount for 10 days before May 2 to avoid delisting.

Alden touched upon Emmis’ shaky financial status in its letter to directors.

“Given the apparent dire financial situation Emmis faces, the Board’s decision to loan [Smulyan] a portion of the Company’s remaining cash, which at the very best will not be recovered until the end of protracted litigation, has subjected the Company to imminent injury beyond just the loss of the illegally loaned funds,” a lawyer for Alden wrote.

A spokeswoman for Emmis, however, maintains the loan was “well-vetted” by directors and company lawyers.

“We're confident with the Board's position on the issue, and have equal confidence in the outcome,” spokeswoman Kate Snedeker said via e-mail.

Alden insists the loan violates a section of Sarbanes-Oxley that it says prevents executives of public corporations from exploiting their relationships with directors to make a company a lender of last resort.

Further, the loan violates disclosure laws, Alden argued, because Emmis failed to list it as “compensation” to Smulyan.

“We searched Emmis’ public disclosures in vain for rationale justifying handing Mr. Smulyan a hidden bonus for use in pursuing dubious claims against one of Emmis’ most significant shareholders,” Alden’s letter said.

The breach-of-contract suit JS Acquisition brought against Alden is pending in federal court in Indianapolis.

Founded by Smulyan in 1981, Emmis owns more than 20 radio stations in the United States and publishes regional magazines in numerous cities, including Indianapolis Monthly.


  • Can't agree with you
    I'm not sure I can agree with you. The article states the money was a 'loan' from the company, which makes it seem like it was have to be repaid. Not sure how Alden could say this was a bonus given that it was a loan.
  • Abuse of power
    Alden is correct in their position. Jeff Smulyan can well afford the attorneys. He is exerting his influence on the board he appointed.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Walgreens did not get a lot of traffic. It was not located on the corner of the intersection, and not really visible from Emerson. Meanwhile the CVS there is huge and right on the corner. I am guessing a lot of people drove by a million times and never knew the Walgreens was there. Although, with the new Walmart market going in, that area could really see a lot of increase in traffic soon.

  2. You folks don't have a clue. There is a legal way to enter this country and to get aid. This left unchecked could run us to ruin quickly. I also heard that 'supporters' were getting major $$ to take them in? Who's monitoring this and guess who pays the bill? I support charitable organizations... but this is NOT the way to do it!

  3. Apparently at some time before alcohol has been served at the fair. The problem is that beer or wine used to be a common drink for people before soft drinks and was not thought to be that unusual. Since many folks now only drink to see how much they can drink or what kind of condition they can end up in it becomes more problematic. Go to Europe and its no big deal just as if you had sodas of milk to drink everyday. Its using common sense that is lacking now days.

  4. To address the epic failure of attracting race fans to both the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400 would take too much of my time to write. Bottom line Boles is clueless and obviously totally out of touch with the real paying fan base. I see nothing but death spin coming for the Brickyard, just like Indy. Get somebody in a place of power that understands what race fans want.

  5. I am a race fan through & through. It doesn't matter if it's Indy cars or Nascar. I love a great race. I go to several other tracks each year and you can see the entire track. I know Indy has tradition, but fans want to see the entire race. I sit in the Penthouse, am almost 60 years old, and would like to see a better TV screen in turn 1 so you can see the entire race. Then I think Indy needs to install an escalator so us old folks can make it up to the Penthouse and down again if we want more options to purchase food and drinks. Just a race fans opinion. Lights won't make the race any better, but you might be able to see the TV better at night. Turn 1's screen needs replaced with a better and bigger screen.