IBJNews

Finish Line boosts earnings outlook on Macy’s deal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Finish Line Inc. said Friday that it is increasing its earnings outlook for fiscal 2013 after announcing an agreement with Macy’s Inc. to become the exclusive athletic footwear partner of the national department store chain.

Terms of the deal call for the Indianapolis-based athletic apparel retailer to open athletic shoe shops in more than 450 Macy’s stores and on its website. The deal—announced Friday morning along with a positive quarterly financial report—is expected to boost Finish Line’s sales $250 million to $350 million a year.

Finish Line now expects fiscal 2013 earnings to grow 6 percent to 9 percent over the previous year. It had anticipated an increase of 6 percent to 7 percent.

Finish Line will lease shoe departments from Cincinnati-based Macy’s in 450 of its stores and manage the athletic footwear assortment in 225 additional Macy’s stores. The rollout of the partnership will begin next spring and should be completed by fall 2014.

“Macy’s large and profitable store portfolio, its customer base that is concentrated in a demographic that Finish Line has not penetrated to date, and most importantly, its customer-centric philosophy and omnichannel focus make them an ideal partner for us to broaden our reach beyond our bricks-and-mortar stores and our website,” Finish Line CEO Glenn Lyon said in a prepared statement.

Meanwhile, Finish Line’s profit for the fiscal second quarter ended Sept. 1 increased 19 percent, from $20.9 million, or 39 cents a share, a year ago, to $25 million, or 49 cents a share.

Revenue increased 16 percent, from $332 million to $385 million.

Analysts had expected the company to earn 44 cents a share on sales of $358.3 million.

Same-store sales rose 12.3 percent, the 12th consecutive quarter the company reported a gain in the key metric. Online sales jumped 29.6 percent.

Finish Line operated 638 stores as of Sept. 1.

Finish Line shares rose 5 percent in premarket trading, to $23.90 each. Those gains were wiped out later in the morning after company executives said in a conference call that same-store sales in September had flattened.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT