IBJNews

Finish Line reports big jump in sales, profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of athletic retail specialist The Finish Line Inc. were soaring in after-hours trading Thursday after the company reported strong fourth-quarter sales and a growing pile of cash on its pristine balance sheet.

The Indianapolis-based company's fourth-quarter profit easily beat Wall Street expectations. Finish Line also reported a 10-percent rise in same-store sales, a key metric, and an impressive year-over-year drop in inventory.

The company reported a profit of $30.5 million, or $0.55 per diluted share, for the period ended Feb. 27. That compares with a loss of just under $1.4 million, or 3 cents per diluted share, during the same period a year ago. Analysts had been expecting a profit of 48 cents per share.

Excluding one-time items, Finish Line earned $33.3 million, or 61 cents per diluted share, in the fourth quarter, compared with $22.1 million or 44 cents per share for the same period in the previous year.

The company's shares were up more than 8 percent in after-hours trading, to $15.90, more than $1 above the previous 52-week high.

Sales rose almost 9 percent to $374.5 million in the fourth quarter compared with $344.1 million a year ago, as more customers visited the chain's 684 stores. And sales could be even stronger in the next quarter: The company said its same-store sales from February 28 through March 21 increased 15.5 percent compared with a 1.2-percent decline last year.

Finish Line said it ended the fiscal year with zero debt and $234.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, up from $115.9 million at the end of the fourth quarter a year ago. The company in the fourth quarter repurchased 1.4 million shares of its outstanding common stock for $15.9 million.

The company's inventories decreased more than 20 percent to $190.9 million, compared with $239.4 million at the end of February 2009.

“I’m proud of the excellent work our team did to achieve improved results in virtually all facets of our business,” Finish Line CEO Glenn Lyon said in a statement. “It is our view that shoppers will likely remain cautious, yet we are encouraged by our results and will stay on-strategy as we continue to focus on delivering value to our shareholders.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT