Finish Line suffers surprising quarterly loss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Finish Line Inc. said Friday that it lost money in its latest quarter, the first unprofitable quarter for the Indianapolis-based retailer since the second period of 2009.

The company said it lost $107,000, less than a penny a share, in the fiscal third quarter ended Dec. 1. A year earlier, the company reported profit of $5.5 million, or 11 cents per share. Revenue rose 5.2 percent, to $296.6 million, over the year-ago period.

The earnings fell short of predictions by analysts polled by Thomson Reuters, which recently forecast per-share earnings of 10 cents on revenue of $296 million.

Finish Line stock fell 6 percent in by midday Friday, to $17.85 per share.

CEO Glenn Lyon blamed the weak quarter on the public’s poor response to a new online store the company launched in mid-November prior to Black Friday. It reverted to its old e-commerce site in early December after experiencing too many problems with the new site.

Lyons also said the company misjudged footwear trends and would increase its selection of basketball products.  

Same-store sales, which exclude sales at stores open less than a year, were up 3.6 percent in the quarter.

Finish Line hadn’t suffered a quarterly loss since the second fiscal quarter of 2009, when an $18.4 charge for selling off its Man Alive stores hurt an otherwise profitable quarter.

The company lowered its full-year earnings estimate to $1.47 to $1.51 a share from its September forecast of roughly $1.62 to $1.67 a share.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!