IBJNews

Florida firm takes majority ownership in Remy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Florida title insurer and mortgage service has acquired majority ownership of Pendleton-based auto-parts manufacturer Remy International Inc.

Fidelity National Financial Inc., which is headquartered in Jacksonville, Fla., purchased 1.18 million additional shares of Remy last week.

Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but Fidelity increased its stake in Remy from 47 percent to to 50.2 percent.

“We continuously pursue avenues to unlock the value of Remy for FNF shareholders,” Fidelity CEO George Scanlon said in a prepared statement. “Given the current market valuation, we believe our shareholders are best served by ... taking a majority ownership position to best control the future of our investment.”

Fidelity officials did not return phone calls seeking comment on the deal.

Eric Struik, Remy’s vice president of finance, said Monday the company does not expect any operational or management changes to result from the Fidelity deal.

“From our perspective,” Struik said, “we really don’t feel like there will be much to change in terms of our day-to-day work.”

Fidelity, in its announcement, described the acquisition as a way to boost investments while improving transparency. The company will begin reporting Remy’s quarterly earnings as a distinct segment of the financial company.

Fidelity reported $147 million in earnings on $1.74 billion in revenue for the second quarter, which ended June 30.

Remy, a privately held company that had been considering an initial public offering, had earnings of $17.4 million and revenue of $294.8 million in the same quarter.

Remy produces starters, alternators and hybrid motors for light- and heavy-duty vehicles. The company also remanufactures starters and alternators.

Fidelity acquired its initial stake in Remy in 2007, when the auto supplier emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.

The manufacturer—once a division of General Motors Corp. that was spun off in 1994 as Delco Remy before adopting its current name in 2004—registered with the Securities Exchange Commission in March 2011.

The filing was a first step toward an IPO, which has not materialized.

“The markets haven’t been very good for IPOs,” Struik said. “As a result, we had some discussions with the board and kind of went back and forth, and we decided not to [do an IPO]. But that remains an option for us.”

Fidelity has been on a buying spree to diversify its assets.

The company is negotiating a $78 million purchase of restaurant chain J. Alexander’s Corp. The eateries would merge with Fidelity-owned Blue Ribbon Holdings LLC. The subsidiary’s chains include O’Charley’s, Max & Erma’s, Bakers Square, Ninety Nine Restaurant, Village Inn and Stoney River Legendary Steaks.

Fidelity also owns 33 percent of human resources service provider Ceridian Corp.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT