IBJNews

Former Indiana regulatory attorney reprimanded

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded a former regulatory attorney for negotiating a job for himself with Duke Energy Corp. while presiding over a case involving millions of dollars in cost overruns at a Duke project.

The court voted 5-0 this week to reprimand Scott Storms, whom Duke later fired amid an ethics flap over the utility's dealings with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, The Indianapolis Star reported Thursday.

A reprimand is the lightest possible punishment for legal misconduct.

Storms was the IURC's general counsel and chief administrative law judge in 2010 when it considered whether to pass along to customers cost overruns at Duke's coal-gasification project in Edwardsport, about 60 miles north of Evansville.

Storms has repeatedly said he didn't mislead his supervisors and didn't compromise his duties, but he agreed to the reprimand. A phone message seeking comment was left for Storms on Thursday.

Storms left the IURC in September 2010 to take a job as regulatory lawyer with Duke Energy. The utility fired Storms two months later, after the Star reported he had been discussing a job with Duke for months while the cost overrun case was pending.

The Indiana State Ethics Commission concluded in 2011 that Storms violated state law. The ethics panel fined him about $12,000 and barred him from future state employment.

Also implicated in the scandal was David Lott Hardy, who was fired as IURC chairman by then-Gov. Mitch Daniels for misconduct. Hardy was indicted on four charges of misconduct, but a Marion county judge dismissed the charges last year. The Indiana Attorney General's office is appealing that ruling.

___

ADVERTISEMENT

  • re
    No joke. The fact that Carl Brizzi was not indicted over either Elkhart or his bizarre purchases in Red Rock and Cellstar is beyond my comprehension other than one named Charlie White who dares to spend the night with his fiance on his nights off from custodial duties, and another named Paul Ogden who is a skilled writer and persistent "checks and balances" blogger--how dare one and another NOT self-deal. Only in Indy.
  • New Name should be The Indiana Disrcriminatory Disciplinary Commission
    A Public Reprimand for a PUBLIC SERVANT SELF DEALING? Reread the 1st paragraph? So he gets a Public Reprimand for what appears to have been behavior highly dubious at best and certainly unethical but Paul Ogden in a private email conversation criticizing a Judges's ineptness gets his Law License Suspended? The US Justice Dept needs to investigate the Rogue elements within the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. They can spend stupid resources on someone that was zealously representing their client by beating the crap out of Paul Ogden who was doing no public damage, but they couldn't uncover William Conour, Paul Page, Carl Brizzi, Tim Durham, etc.... Sickening!,,

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

    2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

    3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

    4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

    5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.

    ADVERTISEMENT