IBJNews

Former Indiana regulatory attorney reprimanded

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded a former regulatory attorney for negotiating a job for himself with Duke Energy Corp. while presiding over a case involving millions of dollars in cost overruns at a Duke project.

The court voted 5-0 this week to reprimand Scott Storms, whom Duke later fired amid an ethics flap over the utility's dealings with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, The Indianapolis Star reported Thursday.

A reprimand is the lightest possible punishment for legal misconduct.

Storms was the IURC's general counsel and chief administrative law judge in 2010 when it considered whether to pass along to customers cost overruns at Duke's coal-gasification project in Edwardsport, about 60 miles north of Evansville.

Storms has repeatedly said he didn't mislead his supervisors and didn't compromise his duties, but he agreed to the reprimand. A phone message seeking comment was left for Storms on Thursday.

Storms left the IURC in September 2010 to take a job as regulatory lawyer with Duke Energy. The utility fired Storms two months later, after the Star reported he had been discussing a job with Duke for months while the cost overrun case was pending.

The Indiana State Ethics Commission concluded in 2011 that Storms violated state law. The ethics panel fined him about $12,000 and barred him from future state employment.

Also implicated in the scandal was David Lott Hardy, who was fired as IURC chairman by then-Gov. Mitch Daniels for misconduct. Hardy was indicted on four charges of misconduct, but a Marion county judge dismissed the charges last year. The Indiana Attorney General's office is appealing that ruling.

___

ADVERTISEMENT

  • re
    No joke. The fact that Carl Brizzi was not indicted over either Elkhart or his bizarre purchases in Red Rock and Cellstar is beyond my comprehension other than one named Charlie White who dares to spend the night with his fiance on his nights off from custodial duties, and another named Paul Ogden who is a skilled writer and persistent "checks and balances" blogger--how dare one and another NOT self-deal. Only in Indy.
  • New Name should be The Indiana Disrcriminatory Disciplinary Commission
    A Public Reprimand for a PUBLIC SERVANT SELF DEALING? Reread the 1st paragraph? So he gets a Public Reprimand for what appears to have been behavior highly dubious at best and certainly unethical but Paul Ogden in a private email conversation criticizing a Judges's ineptness gets his Law License Suspended? The US Justice Dept needs to investigate the Rogue elements within the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. They can spend stupid resources on someone that was zealously representing their client by beating the crap out of Paul Ogden who was doing no public damage, but they couldn't uncover William Conour, Paul Page, Carl Brizzi, Tim Durham, etc.... Sickening!,,

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Aaron is my fav!

    2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

    3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

    4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

    5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

    ADVERTISEMENT