IBJNews

Former Mike's Carwash partner seeking $30M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former co-owner of Mike’s Carwash who claims his two cousins unfairly ousted him from the family business wants to sell them his stake in the chain’s real estate arm for more than $26 million.

The disclosure in a court filing is the latest revelation in a messy lawsuit brought by Jerry Dahm, a cousin of principals Bill and Mike Dahm. Jerry owned 35 percent of the company until May 2010.

Jerry is suing Bill and Mike in Hamilton Superior Court, claiming they fired him after 30 years with the company and forced him to sell his shares at an “unfairly low” valuation after Jerry sought to take out a bank loan using his stake in Mike’s as collateral.

As it stands, Jerry is set to receive payments totaling $17.1 million for his stake in the company.

But according to court documents, Jerry is seeking an additional $3.3 million for his ownership in Mike’s and another $26.2 million from Bill and Mike for his share of the company’s real estate.

Jerry still has a stake in Dahm Property LLC, which owns the real estate where the carwash chain conducts business. But he is seeking to sever ties with Bill and Mike altogether by asking Judge William Hughes to force the two to buy him out of the real estate arm.

The trial, which Hughes heard without a jury, began March 12 and lasted nine days. Attorneys for both sides submitted closing arguments to the judge in writing last Thursday. Hughes is not expected to rule on the case for several weeks.

Jerry Dahm’s lawyer, Brent Taylor of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, declined to comment on his client’s buyout claim. He argued in his closing statement that the judge should force Bill and Mike Dahm to buy Jerry’s share of the real estate holdings because the two conspired to undervalue them by reducing the rents the carwashes paid.

“The rents were set above market level for a reason, and they were being reduced to market level for a sinister reason—to send Jerry a message that Bill and Mike could strip value from [Dahm] Property LLC and Jerry was powerless to stop it,” Taylor wrote.

The property arm has been reducing the rent it charges Mike’s as leases come up for renewal, effectively boosting the business value and depressing the property value.

Jerry’s suit against his two cousins called the rent reductions proof of a “manifest and severe conflict of interest,” while the principals in Mike’s said the reductions are simply a function of declining real estate values.

Mike’s has 37 locations in Indiana and Ohio.

“The proper remedy is one that awards Jerry the value of [Dahm] Property LLC undiminished by the effects of the tortuous plan to reduce the rents,” Taylor wrote.

Bill and Mike Dahm's attorney, Michael Wukmer of Ice Miller LLP, declined to comment on Jerry Dahm's request to force the two to buy his share of the real estate business. But in Wukmer's final court filing, he argued that there is no justification for his clients to buy him out, and that the value Jerry placed on the real estate is too high.

During the trial, Wukmer painted Jerry as a free spender who owed more than $1 million in taxes and whose own behavior caused his firing.

The trouble started in February 2009 when Jerry tried to take out a loan to cover “personal financial obligations” and sought permission from Bill and Mike to pledge his shares in the carwash chain as collateral. They said no, citing a ban on such encumbrances in a 1993 shareholder agreement.

Jerry’s suit alleges that Bill and Mike took advantage of Jerry’s financial difficulties to try to force a sale of his shares.

But Wukmer argued in his closing statement that Jerry produced little or no evidence to support his claim and that his clients followed the correct procedures in valuing the shares of the company.

“He wants to vilify Bill Dahm and Mike Dahm for his plight,” Wukmer wrote, “but the simple truth is that had it not been for Jerry Dahm’s high-lifestyle choices involving undisciplined spending, bad judgment, and ultimately illegal acts involving taxes, he would still be a shareholder in Mike’s Carwash.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • In other words...
    "This is great! We can overpay rents when we need the operating company to be worth less, then we can reduce rents when we need the real estate company to be worth less. So we have really short arms around here..."

    Sincerely,
    Mike's
  • In other words...
    "Yes. We exploited our cousin, son of the the co-founder that made us wealthy beyond our dreams, and 30 year employee - but that's not a crime and it's his own fault. Why should we simply hand him his fair share if we don't have to?"

    Sincerely,
    The always clean, dry, and shiny top 25 places to work employer
    • Contract Law Issue
      It seems that the Shareholder Agreement that stockholders could not pledge stockholdings for collateral when seeking personal loans, set the tone for where this lawsuit is heading. I look forward to reading the court's decision, and to the appeal of the court's decision. This story is not going away any time soon.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

    ADVERTISEMENT