IBJNews

Former Mike's Carwash partner seeking $30M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A former co-owner of Mike’s Carwash who claims his two cousins unfairly ousted him from the family business wants to sell them his stake in the chain’s real estate arm for more than $26 million.

The disclosure in a court filing is the latest revelation in a messy lawsuit brought by Jerry Dahm, a cousin of principals Bill and Mike Dahm. Jerry owned 35 percent of the company until May 2010.

Jerry is suing Bill and Mike in Hamilton Superior Court, claiming they fired him after 30 years with the company and forced him to sell his shares at an “unfairly low” valuation after Jerry sought to take out a bank loan using his stake in Mike’s as collateral.

As it stands, Jerry is set to receive payments totaling $17.1 million for his stake in the company.

But according to court documents, Jerry is seeking an additional $3.3 million for his ownership in Mike’s and another $26.2 million from Bill and Mike for his share of the company’s real estate.

Jerry still has a stake in Dahm Property LLC, which owns the real estate where the carwash chain conducts business. But he is seeking to sever ties with Bill and Mike altogether by asking Judge William Hughes to force the two to buy him out of the real estate arm.

The trial, which Hughes heard without a jury, began March 12 and lasted nine days. Attorneys for both sides submitted closing arguments to the judge in writing last Thursday. Hughes is not expected to rule on the case for several weeks.

Jerry Dahm’s lawyer, Brent Taylor of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, declined to comment on his client’s buyout claim. He argued in his closing statement that the judge should force Bill and Mike Dahm to buy Jerry’s share of the real estate holdings because the two conspired to undervalue them by reducing the rents the carwashes paid.

“The rents were set above market level for a reason, and they were being reduced to market level for a sinister reason—to send Jerry a message that Bill and Mike could strip value from [Dahm] Property LLC and Jerry was powerless to stop it,” Taylor wrote.

The property arm has been reducing the rent it charges Mike’s as leases come up for renewal, effectively boosting the business value and depressing the property value.

Jerry’s suit against his two cousins called the rent reductions proof of a “manifest and severe conflict of interest,” while the principals in Mike’s said the reductions are simply a function of declining real estate values.

Mike’s has 37 locations in Indiana and Ohio.

“The proper remedy is one that awards Jerry the value of [Dahm] Property LLC undiminished by the effects of the tortuous plan to reduce the rents,” Taylor wrote.

Bill and Mike Dahm's attorney, Michael Wukmer of Ice Miller LLP, declined to comment on Jerry Dahm's request to force the two to buy his share of the real estate business. But in Wukmer's final court filing, he argued that there is no justification for his clients to buy him out, and that the value Jerry placed on the real estate is too high.

During the trial, Wukmer painted Jerry as a free spender who owed more than $1 million in taxes and whose own behavior caused his firing.

The trouble started in February 2009 when Jerry tried to take out a loan to cover “personal financial obligations” and sought permission from Bill and Mike to pledge his shares in the carwash chain as collateral. They said no, citing a ban on such encumbrances in a 1993 shareholder agreement.

Jerry’s suit alleges that Bill and Mike took advantage of Jerry’s financial difficulties to try to force a sale of his shares.

But Wukmer argued in his closing statement that Jerry produced little or no evidence to support his claim and that his clients followed the correct procedures in valuing the shares of the company.

“He wants to vilify Bill Dahm and Mike Dahm for his plight,” Wukmer wrote, “but the simple truth is that had it not been for Jerry Dahm’s high-lifestyle choices involving undisciplined spending, bad judgment, and ultimately illegal acts involving taxes, he would still be a shareholder in Mike’s Carwash.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • In other words...
    "This is great! We can overpay rents when we need the operating company to be worth less, then we can reduce rents when we need the real estate company to be worth less. So we have really short arms around here..."

    Sincerely,
    Mike's
  • In other words...
    "Yes. We exploited our cousin, son of the the co-founder that made us wealthy beyond our dreams, and 30 year employee - but that's not a crime and it's his own fault. Why should we simply hand him his fair share if we don't have to?"

    Sincerely,
    The always clean, dry, and shiny top 25 places to work employer
    • Contract Law Issue
      It seems that the Shareholder Agreement that stockholders could not pledge stockholdings for collateral when seeking personal loans, set the tone for where this lawsuit is heading. I look forward to reading the court's decision, and to the appeal of the court's decision. This story is not going away any time soon.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

    2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

    3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

    4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

    5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

    ADVERTISEMENT