IBJNews

Fortune Industries set to accept $13.3M buyout offer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two executives of Fortune Industries Inc. who began pursuing a shareholder buyout nearly a year ago have agreed to purchase the company for $13.3 million.

The Indianapolis-based personal employer organization revealed in a public filing earlier this month that the proposed buyer is CEP Inc., a holding company led by Fortune Industries CEO Tena Mayberry and Chief Financial Officer Randy Butler.

CEP would be based in Nashville, Tenn.

The filing says the two will pay $7 million in cash and the remaining $6.3 million with a promissory note to acquire common and preferred shares held by the estate of company founder Carter Fortune, who died in August.

In addition, Mayberry and Butler will pay stockholders owning less than 500 shares 61 cents per share, or a total of $56,718. Shareholders with more than 500 shares will continue to own their stock, amounting to a 10-percent stake in the company.

Fortune Industries’ sale to Mayberry and Butler would end months of uncertainly about the future of the company.

Most recently, Fortune Industries terminated its purchase agreement in January with skilled-nursing operator Ide Management Group LLC of Greenfield.

Fortune Industries had planned to exit the PEO business in favor of becoming a skilled-nursing operator following the death of Fortune.

Under the unusual proposal, Fortune Industries would have remained a public company and abandoned its previous plan to be taken private.

The restructuring hinged on shareholder approval of a merger agreement with Ide that would have given Ide Management CEO Mark Ide shares in Fortune Industries. Founded by Ide in 1997, IMG owns or manages 20 skilled-nursing facilities in Indiana, Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin.

But Mayberry and Butler first bid for Fortune Industries last March, before Fortune died and before the company considered the Ide proposal. Similar to their original bid, the latest offer from the two will result in the company going private.

Mayberry and Butler plan to acquire company shares from Carter Fortune’s estate and use them to buy out Fortune Industries’ PEO subsidiaries, which would operate within CEP.

Fortune realized a profit of $120,000 on revenue of $13.7 million in the quarter ended Dec. 31.

Shares of the thinly traded company were at 23 cents each Thursday morning, up one penny.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Stay Public
    This Company is like one of a kind. I like to keep investing into this Company for future betterment. F. Friend

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So, Pence wants the federal government to ignore the 2008 law that allows children from these countries to argue for asylum in front of a judge. How did this guy become governor? And how is that we'll soon be subjected to repeatedly seeing him on TV being taken seriously as a presidential candidate? Am I in Bizzaro-U.S.A.?

  2. "And the most rigorous studies of one-year preschool programs have shown short-term benefits that fade out in a few years or no benefits at all." So we are going down a path that seems to have proven not to work very well. Right intention, wrong approach?

  3. Well for Dunkin Donuts it might say that even a highly popular outlet can't make a poorly sited location work. That little strip has seen near constant churn for years.

  4. Years ago, the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device companies shifted their research investment away from Medical Institutions to focus more on private research centers, primarily because of medical institution inefficiencies in initiating clinical studies and their inability/commitment to enroll the needed number of patients in these studies. The protracted timelines of the medical institutions were prompting significant delays in the availability of new drug and medical device entities for patients and relatedly, higher R and D expenditures to the commercial industry because of these delays. While the above stated IU Health "ratio is about $2.50 in federal funding for every $1 in industry funding", the available funding is REVERSED as commercial R and D (primarily Phase I-IV clinical work)runs $2.50 to $1 for available federal funding ($76.8B to $30.9B in 2011). The above article significatly understated the available R and D funding from industry......see the Pharma and Medical Device industry websites. Clearly, if medical institutions like IU Health wish to attract more commercial studies, they will need to become more competitive with private clinical sites in their ability to be more efficient and in their commitment to meet study enrollment goals on time. Lastly, to the reference to the above Washington Post article headlined “As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias", lacks some credibility as both FDA and Institutional Institutional Review Boards must approve the high proportion of these studies before studies are started. This means that both study safety and science must be approved by both entities.

  5. ChIeF and all the other critics – better is better no matter what. Get over it; they are doing better despite you ?

ADVERTISEMENT