IBJNews

Funeral operator slapped with criminal charges

Scott Olson
January 17, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Marion County Prosecutor's Office filed criminal charges today relating to the status of trust funds set aside to pay funeral expenses and cemetery maintenance for a string of Indiana cemeteries.

Robert Nelms, a New Jersey resident who owns Indianapolis-based Memory Gardens Management Corp., has been charged with a series of felonies, including fraud-related violations of Indiana's securities law, theft and conspiracy to commit theft.

Nelms is accused of defrauding the families of deceased Hoosiers of $27 million, according to the Indiana Secretary of State's Securities Prosecution Assistance Unit, which assisted in the investigation.

It charges that Nelms used fraudulent securities instruments similar to corporate bonds to transfer the cash and assets of Memory Gardens' perpetual care fund. The Secretary of State's Office said he hid the money through a variety of complex monetary transfers and used the funds to pay some of Memory Gardens' purchase price, as well as for various personal reasons.

Nelms bought Memory Gardens, which owns and operates cemeteries and funeral homes, in 2004. He is accused of raiding:
-Forest Lawn Memory Gardens Inc. and Forest Lawn Memorial Chapel, Greenwood
-Covington Memorial Gardens Inc. and Covington Memorial Funeral Home, Fort Wayne
-Chapel Hill Associates Inc. and Chapel Hill Funeral Home Inc., Osceola
-Lincoln Memory Gardens Inc., Boone County
-Gardens of Memory, Muncie
-Gill Funeral Home Inc., Washington

Indiana law requires the owner of a private cemetery to provide for the creation and establishment of an irrevocable perpetual care fund. The fund is designed to permanently maintain cemeteries to benefit the community and those who purchase lots there.



ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT