IBJOpinion

Future Fund's start is not so slow

January 9, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

In response to your Dec. 21 article labeling the Indiana Future Fund as “off to slow start,” I believe some additional historical perspective is warranted. Our firm, Spring Mill Venture Partners, a recipient of funding from the IFF, has invested in 10 seed and early-stage companies. Of those, 70 percent are Indiana-based companies.

The premise of the IFF, launched in 2004, was to:

• foster the creation and growth of life sciences companies in Indiana,

• encourage the growth of a vibrant Indiana-based venture capital community, and

• facilitate public and private partnerships within the state.

Venture capital as an engine for economic growth has no equal. Although it remains a relatively small asset class, in 2008 venture capital-backed companies employed more than 12 million people and generated nearly $3 trillion in revenue. Respectfully, these figures accounted for 11 percent of private-sector employment and represented the equivalent of 21 percent of U.S. gross domestic product during that same year (NVCA Venture Impact Study, 2009).

The median age of a venture-backed company at the time of its initial public offering has increased from 4.5 years in 1998 to 9.6 years as of year-end 2008. The median company age at the time of a mergers and acquisitions exit has increased to 6.5 years over the same time frame.

Based on a typical five-year investment cycle, the median age of our portfolio companies is less than 4 years old, shorter than the typical exit horizon for an early-stage investment. In fact, it would be a surprise if seed and early-stage investments were creating significant exits at this point.

In summary, I believe your portrayal deserves further explanation in order to provide a complete picture of the scenario. I hope I have provided more of that for your readers.

____________

David Mann

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT