IBJNews

Future of western Indiana power plant in doubt, Duke says

Associated Press
September 16, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. expects to close much of a coal-powered generating plant in western Indiana within the next few years.

The company is watching new federal environmental regulations that are due for release in November and considering shutting down several of the six units at Wabash River Station near Terre Haute as soon as 2014, Duke spokeswoman Angeline Protogere said.

"While we haven't made any final decisions, our units at Wabash River Station are likely to be retired earlier than expected," Protogere told the Tribune-Star of Terre Haute.

The power plant was completed in stages between 1953 and 1968. Duke owns five of its generating units, with the other owned by Wabash Valley Power Association and SG Solutions.

Duke has about 100 employees and 40 full-time contractors at the plant, but Protogere said the company didn't yet know how a shutdown would affect the work force.

The review of the Wabash plant's future comes as Duke is completing construction of a nearly $3 billion coal-gasification plant near Edwardsport in southwestern Indiana. Duke is the state's largest electric utility with about 780,000 customers covering much of the state's midsection.

Three units at the Wabash plant were shut down in 2009 as part of an order from a federal judge after a jury found the plant's previous owner, Cinergy, violated the Clean Air Act by making unauthorized changes that increased pollution. An appeals court overturned that order last year, allowing Duke Energy to restart the units.

Protogere said Duke intends to keep the Wabash River Station property.

"It's usually difficult to find locations for new power generation, so the site is an option we'll consider for future generation," she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT