IBJNews

GE, union talks save jobs at Bloomington plant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Negotiations between GE and union officials have slightly reduced the number of job cuts being made at the company's southern Indiana refrigerator factory.

About 130 workers at the GE Appliances factory in Bloomington will no longer have jobs effective Friday, although that number is down from about 160 jobs the company announced in early September, The Herald-Times reported.

Discussions between the sides led to a total of 56 layoffs and 75 early retirements, which saves some of the factory's jobs, said Carven Thomas, president of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2249.

"The company agreed to keep 25 additional people as a result of the negotiations," Thomas said. "It was probably one of the hardest negotiations I've been through."

The 75 employees taking early retirement means 57 percent of the job cuts are retirements. GE expected 35 percent of the cuts to come from early retirements when it announced them.

GE officials blamed the job cuts on a 30-percent decline since 2010 in demand for the side-by-side refrigerators made at the factory, which had about 520 workers when the cuts were announced. The company touted plans three years ago for a $161 million investment and 200 more jobs at the Bloomington plant, but it says the sales decline caused it to drop those plans.

Frank Scheffel, the Bloomington plant operations manager, said the cuts were needed to make the factory more competitive.

"Our employees have done everything we asked to help counter a declining side-by-side refrigeration industry, but, at the end of the day, reducing our workforce was the best solution for the long-term future of the business," he said.

The average age of the Bloomington plant's union workers will be 55 after the cuts are completed because of several rounds of seniority-based layoffs over the years, Thomas said.

"The seniority level of the people affected has never been this high," Thomas said. "Putting 25-year, 26-year people out on the streets, that was one of the toughest things we've had to do."
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT