IBJNews

Gleaners capital campaign raises $12.3 million

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Gleaners Food Bank is wrapping up an ambitious capital campaign, announcing that it has exceeded its goal despite the difficult economic environment.

The Indianapolis-based agency publicly launched the $11.6 million fundraising effort in April, just before it moved to the former Monarch Beverage Co. warehouse on Indianapolis’ southwest side. Planning and private fundraising began in 2008.

On Wednesday, Gleaners said it has raised $12.3 million.

The Campaign for Gleaners covered the expense of buying and equipping the Monarch facility—which has more than three times as much space as the building where Gleaners operated for 25 years—and relocating the not-for-profit agency.

Nearly 8,500 donations were made during the campaign, Gleaners said, including 16 pledges of $100,000 or more.

“We are humbly grateful for the support of so many … which will allow Gleaners to continue to serve hungry Hoosiers throughout central and southeastern Indiana for decades to come,” CEO Cindy Hubert said in a prepared statement.

Last year, the agency provided the equivalent of 19.5 million meals to help feed more than 160,000 people in central Indiana. It is the main food supplier to food pantries in 21 counties.

Although the campaign is closing, its fundraising efforts continue. Gleaners still has some “major equipment needs, endowment goals and other initiatives” that were not fully funded by the campaign, Hubert said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT