IBJNews

UPDATE: GOP budget includes big shift in school funding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana schools could see major shifts in funding under a state budget plan presented by Republicans who control the Indiana House.

Republican leaders said that their two-year, $28 billion budget held most spending flat and avoided tax increases. The budget would keep overall education spending at current levels, but includes changes to the distribution formula will hurt some urban and rural schools and help some suburban schools. The House Ways and Means Committee is slated to vote on the budget proposal Friday morning.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale, said the proposed school funding formula eliminates extra grants for small schools and only pays schools for students actually enrolled, eliminating the extra cash shrinking districts currently receive to help ease their financial losses after students leave.

"The money really should follow the child — and the child should exist," Espich said. "You shouldn't be funding a ghost child."

Republican lawmakers have pushed for years to even out the disparities between schools that get high per-pupil funding and those that get lower amounts. Shrinking urban and rural districts often get higher funding per student and fast-growing suburban districts get lower amounts.

When Democrats controlled the House in recent years, they insisted on buffers to prop up schools with declining enrollments in an effort to minimize teacher layoffs and increases in class size. Now that Republicans control the House, GOP leaders want to quickly equal out per-pupil funding levels.

The proposed funding formula aims to move each school district toward its "target" amount of per-student funding, which is a base amount of spending plus additional money for districts with larger numbers of poor students. Most districts are currently above their target amounts and would gradually receive less per-pupil funding to eventually reach their target within 9 years.

But a handful of districts currently more than 20 percent above their per-pupil targets would see bigger drops immediately because the formula states that districts cannot be more than 20 percent above target numbers. Espich said the abrupt change was needed.

"If you don't do something rather drastic, you have these outliers that are sucking up all the money," Espich said.

Education officials said the changes proposed Thursday would mean serious cuts of millions of dollars to some districts. Even keeping overall education spending flat over the next two years amounts to a cut, they argue, because of schools' rising costs.

"We knew this was not going to be a pretty picture," said Dennis Costerison, executive director of the Indiana Association of School Business Officials. "It's a cut. There's no other way to look at it."

Rep. William Crawford, D-Indianapolis, said schools are continually being told that they have to do more with less.

"I don't know how much they're going to be able to do," he said.

House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, said the budget proposal will hurt public schools, as will Republican education initiatives such as expanded charter schools and vouchers that use tax money to help parents send their children to private school.

"We're concerned about the whole approach to education this year," Bauer said. "There are going to be a lot of teachers laid off and a lot of programs cut this fall."


ADVERTISEMENT
  • More differences
    Also, let's think about simple things like paper, pencils, and other school supplies. Who remembers the Indy Star article about the IPS teacher that went dumpster diving in Carmel and retrieved a treasure trove of NEW, UNOPENED notebooks, boxes of crayons, pencils, etc. Look at the difference in what kind of support the schools in these districts get from the students' families. It shouldn't be that way, but it is a fact that schools have to deal with.
  • Expenses
    Don't forget to add in the salaries of special ed teachers, security, counselors. Also, I'm speculating now, but I'm guessing teachers salaries might be higher in e.g. IPS, Gary districts to try to attract teachers to work there. I'm guessing there's probably a fair amount of turnover in teacher ranks in those districts, but would like to know if facts bear that out?
  • Disparity...
    I'm pretty sure the IPS number in question is closer to $9,000 than $11,000 - but I won't let the facts get in the way of your story.

    I agree that the $2-3,000 does seem like a pretty big difference between two districts however it does make sense on a couple levels.

    First, that $3,000 goes to feeding better than 80% of the IPS kids lunch (and breakfast). I know this isn't your problem Rich, but I'm just stating a fact.

    Second, I'm sure some of that money goes to English as a 2nd language costs...again, not your problem.

    Third, HSE, Carmel, Fishers, etc are maintaining buildings that are much newer and more energy efficient. The facilities fee per student is far higher per student in IPS than the doughnut schools...at least for the next twenty years.

    Don't worry, HSE's portion will increase when more IPS kids start enrolling in the country schools. My kids go to a Charter (that we love), but the new bill that just passed is more likely to distribute students with special needs (financial, educational and emotional) to the private and county schools than do anything else.
  • INEQUALITY
    IPS, GARY= almost $11,000 per pupil
    HSE= $5,800 PER PUPIL

    Who is getting screwed in this deal...hint, it's not urban poor schools.
    • Someone please make them explain
      why is a singular focus on per-pupil funding is appropriate?? Sure, it makes a great sound bite. But stop and think about all of the expenses that different school districts have that are reflected in those numbers, and then let's compare.
    • Just close them
      Why bother having schools in urban and rural areas? Just make sure that the suburban white kids have, say, Carmel HS (isn't that the Governor's district?) and let the rest of us fend for ourselves. That fits perfectly with the rest of the legislature's apparent plan for Indiana. I wonder what will happen when all those UAW members with kids in rural public schools finally realize what they've voted for....

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

      We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

      We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

      Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

      So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

      I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

    2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

      The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

      PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

      The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

      Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

    3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

    4. Triscuts...love um!

    5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

    ADVERTISEMENT