IBJNews

Governor approves new teacher licensing rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels has approved

Daniels signed the new rules Tuesday, three months after a state panel approved them amid criticism from college educators who said they would not improve the quality of the state's teachers.

The new rules include a requirement that people teaching grades 5 through 12 earn baccalaureate degrees in the subjects they teach. The earlier rules qualified people holding an education degree alone for an Indiana teaching license to teach those grades.

Daniels says the new rules mean that from now on all Indiana teachers will know the subject they are teaching. The rules also will allow people in other careers to move more easily into teaching.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Its about time
    What about at the elementary level where young brains are supposed to be taught how to learn, how to study, and how to think. I have found out some of the teachers in our Township don't even have teaching degrees not to mention not even a degree in what they are teaching. How can someone who was a "trainer" in the Army, be hired to teach elementary students? Aren't all township teachers supposed to have some kind of certification? No wonder our students don't learn - they don't have teachers.

    Just saying.....
  • Why Not for Other Professions?
    This is brilliance itself. Why not take the same measures for other professions? For example, since we have a shortage of physicians in Indiana, why not fast track biology majors and license them to become Cardiologists? Who cares if they have no training in surgery. Why not have Math majors licensed to become CPAs! Who cares if they've never had a course in accounting. And then there's Bankers and CEOs -- even the kids who flunked ISTEP Math can add as well as they can when calculating their own bonuses! Come on Governor, you're not thinking big enough!
  • YES!
    Its about time! College would be much easier if I would have been taught correctly in the first place.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT