IBJNews

Grand jury indicts former state utilities chief Hardy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Marion County grand jury has indicted David Lott Hardy, the state’s former utilities chief, on three counts of official misconduct.

Hardy was fired from his job as chairman of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission by Gov. Mitch Daniels in October 2010.  Hardy allegedly allowed IURC administrative law judge Scott Storms to preside over cases involving Duke Energy Corp. even while Storms was talking with the utility about a job.

“We look forward to vigorously prosecuting this case to its conclusion,” Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry,  a Democrat, said Monday in a prepared statement.

The grand jury indicted Hardy on Friday. Official misconduct is a class D felony, which can carry a sentence of 6 months to 3 years and a maximum $10,000 fine.

The indictment states that Hardy “knowingly” aided and abetted Storms by communicating with employees of Duke Energy regarding Storms’ prospective employment “while allowing Storms to continue to participate in proceedings involving Duke Energy.”

The two other indictments accuse Hardy of failing to disclose "ex-parte," or private, communication with top Duke officials about cost overruns at Duke’s Edwardsport coal-gasification plant, which is under construction. The communications came as ratepayer groups were fighting Duke’s request to recover additional money from ratepayers to cover cost escalations.

The indictment cites three incidents in which Hardy allegedly received communications from Duke about Edwardsport in 2008 and 2010, including discussions with Duke Chairman James E. Rogers and with former Duke Indiana head James Turner.

The ethics scandal cost both Hardy and Storms their jobs—Storms was fired after later accepting a job at Duke. The case also presented a public relations challenge to Daniels, a Republican, who appointed Hardy as chairman of the commission and has publicly supported the Duke Edwardsport plant. Initially projected to cost $1.8 billion, the plant’s price tag has risen to $3 billion.

Watchdog groups, including Citizens Action Coalition, want Duke to absorb the cost of overruns rather than tapping ratepayers for the increased expenses.

Curry said the official misconduct indictment is significant particularly in light of the $3 billion Edwardsport project’s implications to Duke and to its ratepayers.

“If the public is to have confidence in the ultimate result,” Curry added, “they need to know that everybody played by the same rules.”

A review of e-mails showed that Hardy coached Storms into getting a job at Duke. The e-mails also showed that Hardy met with top Duke officials about cost overruns at Edwardsport, in what CAC complained amounted to ex parte communication. 

Officials at CAC, which has long opposed Duke’s Edwardsport plant, were pleased to hear of the grand jury indictment.

“We’re not surprised. We have felt all along without question … that Scott Storms’ hiring reeked of impropriety and was completely improper,” said Kerwin Olson, executive director of CAC.

The ethics scandal has already come back to bite the state’s biggest electric utility.

The IURC last October reversed a ruling made by Storms. It would have allowed Duke at its next rate case to seek to recover from ratepayers $12 million in costs the utility incurred during a 2009 ice storm.

Also, the commission dismissed a case handled by Storms in which Duke sought permission to tap ratepayers to install "smart" electric meters in central Indiana to help better regulate loads. That project was estimated to cost $22 million.

The case in which Duke sought to collect storm damage costs is most notable. It was the only Scott Storms case the commission decided to reopen for further review after the ethics scandal came to light last year.

It was also the only proceeding involving Storms in which one of the parties—the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor—had appealed to the state Court of Appeals.

The OUCC argued that Duke’s attempts to recover the ice storm damages during a future rate case amounted to retroactive ratemaking, which is permitted only in the case of extraordinary financial events. Charlotte, N.C.-based Duke reported 2010 revenue of $14.2 billion.


 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT