IBJOpinion

SCHELLINGER: Green delegation should work hard on influence

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SchellingerRoll Call reported several weeks ago that Indiana’s clout in Washington, D.C., has slipped in the rankings from 27th to 42nd. This is certainly no surprise in the wake of Sen. Richard Lugar’s departure, in addition to former Sen. Evan Bayh and former congressman and now Gov. Mike Pence.

Several Associated Press stories indicated in November 2012 that “Indiana lost 78 years of congressional experience among its senators and representatives.”

The loss of congressmen Brad Ellsworth and Baron Hill in 2010 started the downward trend.

To break it down, Indiana boasted an average of 13-1/2 years of experience per member after the 2008 election. Just four years later, the Hoosier delegation averaged 3-1/2 years.

The wave of Republican freshmen and sophomores has taken a toll on the influence Indiana can muster in national policy matters on Capitol Hill. Clearly, U.S. Rep. Pete Visclosky carries some weight, but as a member of the minority, he will have difficulty affecting big outcomes for Indiana.

Sen. Dan Coats is the leader of the Indiana delegation, has the most significant committee assignments, and will be the most accountable when it comes to looking after Hoosier interests.

New Sen. Joe Donnelly can certainly be helpful to the president by forging coalitions of folks who are motivated to move important public policy initiatives forward, especially those that can be embraced by more moderate members of Congress interested in getting things done for the American people.

I think we can all agree that Congress needs more consensus-building and less political posturing. I remain hopeful that President Obama, House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid can advance job creation, debt reduction, retirement security, immigration policy, education transformation, college and health care affordability, and gun safety legislation in the next year or two.

The Hoosier delegation must stand together to protect our state’s interest when it comes to securing our fair share of federal dollars. But, we also must remember we are one of 50 states seeking to form a more perfect union. With that many cooks in the kitchen, I think we all understand the need to play nicely.

This is truly a moment for our newer members of Congress to work hard and distinguish themselves in particular areas of specialty. Energy, agriculture, technology, defense and transportation come to mind as important for Indiana.

Yes, we may have lost some juice in the halls of Washington, but now is the time to begin rebuilding and for some members to become leaders and consensus-builders for all of us. New faces should translate into new ideas, and better ways of doing business in the federal government.

Susan Brooks, Luke Messer and Todd Rokita are seasoned public servants, and many folks in central Indiana have tremendous confidence in Andre Carson, as well.

These days, the stakes are simply too high for partisan gridlock and unsophisticated approaches to some of the toughest economic problems America and the world have faced in over 30 years. We’re all in this together, and we had best start acting like it.•

__________

Schellinger, chairman and CEO of CSO Architects Inc., ran for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in 2008. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT