Gregg picks Simpson to add balance to ticket

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Gregg reached out to his party's base Tuesday with his pick for lieutenant governor, a liberal lawmaker with decades of experience at the Indiana Statehouse.

Gregg tapped Senate Minority Leader Vi Simpson as his running mate Tuesday. The addition of Simpson, an abortion-rights supporter, to the Democratic ticket should shore up support for Gregg among liberal Democrats and prompt Democratic donors turned off by his anti-abortion stance and opposition to same-sex marriage to open up their wallets.

"I think the fact John reached out to me to be on the ticket speaks very highly of him and his desire to have people of different perspectives and different viewpoints at the table. He expressed to me in very clear words that he does not want to be a yes man." Simpson said Tuesday outside the Statehouse.

Gregg got his biggest applause from the crowd Tuesday when he played up their joint support for women's access to health care, which has become a national talking point for Democrats.

"I wanted someone like me who recognized that women's access to health is not an issue of pro-life or pro-choice, but that it is a question of access to health care," he said.

Gregg's announcement comes one day after Republican candidate Mike Pence added state Rep. Sue Ellspermann to his ticket. The two campaigns' announcements virtually guarantee Indiana will have its third consecutive female lieutenant governor.

Libertarian Rupert Boneham is running with Brad Klopfenstein.

Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault called Simpson a good choice for the opposing party. "I would like to congratulate Senator Simpson on being selected by Speaker Gregg as his running mate. She is worthy of being her party's nominee for Lt. Governor," Denault said in a brief written statement.

Simpson, at one time a strong contender for governor in her own right, has deep roots among the party's liberal base. That could help Gregg smooth over some stumbles made during the start of his run for governor.

Perhaps the worst of those stumbles was a statement from Gregg issued just hours after Indiana became the 23rd state to enact right-to-work legislation vehemently opposed by unions in which he said it was time to move on. The AFL-CIO declined to issue a primary endorsement for Gregg last month, even though the group issued primary endorsements for other uncontested Democrats like Senate candidate Joe Donnelly.

"Vi brings not just the women, but she brings a whole segment if the community that felt that they did not have a voice and would not be represented," said Rep. Charlie Brown, a Gary Democrat who began serving in the House two years before Simpson joined the Senate.

Brown also highlighted her ability to raise money for Gregg, who has been easily outgunned by Pence and Indiana Republicans in the money race.

Simpson will be giving up the state Senate seat she has held since 1984 to run with Gregg. Republicans and Democrats are scheduled to cement their tickets for governor at their respective party conventions next month.


  • How much does it really help?
    I appreciate that both candidates chose a woman as a running mate and that Gregg chose a liberal for balance. I'm just not sure how much it will help. There aren't that many hardcore liberals in Indiana. And it may make independents come out for Pence.

    Most independents are not single issue voters, so her stance on abortion might not make any difference. And her Right To Work position probably hurts. Her claim that RTW was union busting turned out to be flat wrong, and people got disgusted by the democratic walkout.

    Besides, how many people really care what a Lt. Gov. thinks? Quick: think of some gut-wrenching issue that Becky Skillman addressed...time's up!
  • Interesting
    I find it interesting the Democrats tout that they are all for women and women's rights, health, blah, blah, blah. But when it comes to women in their party they really have no leaders. It seems that every time the democrats need a woman to run in Indiana they pick Vi. I think they are all talk because beyond Vi I don't see them bringing up any other women through their party ranks.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.