Grissom air base to get $7.4 million control tower

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana air base that houses the nation's largest fleet of KC135 four-engine tankers will get a high-tech air traffic control tower next year that supporters say will better serve its growing military, civilian and commercial aviation needs.

Lt. Col. Gary Lockard, the base's public affairs chief, says the $7.4 million tower at Grissom Air Reserve Base north of Kokomo will replace a tower built in 1965.

The nine-story tower will increase visibility to 10,000 feet and will provide space for a control-tower simulator to enhance training, said Col. William Tim Cahoon, commander of the 434th Air Refueling Wing stationed at the base. Cahoon told the Kokomo Tribune that the new facility also will have increased security and office space and will have better environmental controls than the tower it replaces.

Cahoon said the old tower is "long in the tooth" and that its replacement will better reflect the technology that goes into air traffic facilities.

"It's more than just having a radio and looking out of a window like you see in a movie," he said. "This really is a big deal."

The new tower, scheduled to open in the summer of 2012, will accent a recently completed radar-approach control center.

Base officials and customers say the upgrades are welcome as business expands at the base, which was realigned as an Air Reserve base in the early 1990s.

Dan Montgomery, owner of Montgomery Aviation, welcomes the new addition.

"That's an old tower that has been there for a long time. The new tower will help with traffic flow and really improve traffic," he said.

Cahoon said he expects the tower's benefits will extend beyond aviation.

"You don't usually get a lot of $7.4 million projects in north central Indiana," he said. "Economically, this will benefit the base and the community. There are economic benefits from this and we will get good use from it."


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.