IBJNews

Group aims to cut costs of late-stage drugs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

You know things are bad in the fiercely competitive pharma industry when drugmakers start turning to each other for help.

But that’s exactly what happened last week when 10 major drug companies—including Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co.—joined forces to cut costs out of clinical trials.

The 10 companies formed a not-for-profit organization called TransCelerate BioPharma Inc. Each company is contributing roughly a dozen employees to the project, as well as an undisclosed amount of money.

TransCelerate has a list of about 50 projects to work on to cut unnecessary costs from Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials. Those two stages of human testing cost nearly $150 million per drug, according to studies by the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.

“It’s significant,” said Jeff Kasher, vice president of Lilly’s Development Center of Excellence in Indianapolis, of the potential cost savings of the effort. He declined to quantify the expected savings, but he added, “I’m really, really confident that we’re going to deliver the goods from this group.”

TransCelerate has an initial three-year goal to show time and dollar savings in five areas. They include establishing a common supply model for comparison drugs—the existing medicines that experimental drugs are often tested against.

Also, TransCelerate plans to develop a common computer interface for physicians and their staffs conducting drug trials, which would recognize which companies and which drugs that particular medical center is doing work for and grant computer access to only those trials.

TransCelerate also intends to develop a new approach to monitoring the various sites that conduct clinical trials. Currently, some drug companies require extensive paper documentation of every aspect of a clinical trial while others do random sampling to generate statistics, which they use to monitor the clinical trial sites.

But TransCelterate will try to unite all 10 drug companies under a “risk-based monitoring approach” that documents aspects of drug trials that will be key in the regulatory review of the drug and pays less attention to less-critical areas.

“Everybody does it differently. Nobody really does it all that better than anybody else. But because we do it differently, we create confusion for a lot of the research sites,” Kasher said.

The 10 companies participating in TransCelerate are Lilly; Illinois-based Abbott Laboratories; United Kingdom-based AstraZeneca plc; Germany-based Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH; New York-based Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.; United Kingdom-based GlaxoSmithKline plc; New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson; New York-based Pfizer Inc.; Genentech Inc.; which is a subsidiary of the Switzerland-based Roche Group; and France-based Sanofi-Aventis SA.

Many of them have struggled recently to launch enough new drugs to offset declining sales after their older blockbusters' patents expire. Lilly is in the midst of a four-year run in which it will see patents on five blockbusters expire, sapping as much as $10 billion in annual revenue.

Lilly has pushed more than 60 new drugs into experimental trials, but the cost of testing all of those in humans is pinching the company’s profits. A similar story is playing out at many of its competitors’.

“Even five years ago, this wouldn’t have happened,” Kasher said. “I’d say there’s frustration across the industry and pressure across the industry to accelerate the development of innovative medicines.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT