Group opposes city plan to pay water manager Veolia $29M

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A group of Indianapolis Water customers has asked regulators to block the city’s plan to pay the utility’s operator, Veolia Water, a $29 million contract-termination fee ahead of the planned sale of the city-owned utility to Citizens Energy Group.

Consumer Ratepayers’ request, filed this month with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, alleges that Veolia committed numerous contract violations since 2002 that would entitle the city to terminate the management contract “for cause.”

As such, the city “would not have been obligated to pay Veolia any termination fee. None,” Consumer Ratepayers attorney John R. Price wrote in the Dec. 17 filing.

The IURC this month OK’d Consumer Ratepayers' request to intervene in the case, in which the city seeks state approval to sell Indianapolis Water to Citizens Energy for $1.9 billion.

The ratepayers group consists of 11 Indianapolis Water customers: Andrea Campoli, William Curry, Sheila Curry, Bill Maxson, Teresa Maxson, Steven McGann, Betty McGann, Don Miller, Vincent Perkins, Mari Perkins and Tom Plummer.  Plummer is identified as a long-term employee of the water utility.

Mayor Greg Ballard proposed the sale of the city’s water and sewer utilities to Citizens last March as a way to generate more than $425 million for city infrastructure improvements.

Proponents said the sale would remove the utility from city politics and save $60 million a year by consolidating the water utility under Citizens’ gas, steam and chilled water operations.

Opponents say city oversight is crucial and that a sale leaves it solely in the hands of the IURC, which has been rocked by an ethics scandal in recent months.

Last October, the city announced it would pay Veolia a $29 million contract-termination fee for improvements it made to the water system since it began operating it for the city in 2002. Veolia's contract was to have expired in 2022.

Consumer Ratepayers alleges Veolia effectively defaulted on the management contract on numerous occasions, including failing to maintain operable fire hydrants, refusing to pay costs of a water-quality program mandated by the state, failing to properly manage the utility’s financial affairs and terminating non-bargaining unit employee benefits.

“Veolia’s termination of employee benefits, if without authorization by the city, and Veolia’s failure to properly manage cash needs of the water works, would either one have been another clear instance of default under the management agreement,” Price wrote.

Veolia officials plan to file a detailed response to the motion, said company spokesman Paul Whitmore.

“We think the claims in the motion are baseless and some are factually inaccurate. We believe the settlement agreement represents a very fair resolution of the contract and right now are focused on a smooth transition,” Whitmore said.

Chris Cotterill, chief of staff for Mayor Ballard, acknowledged that the city and Veolia have had “ups and downs” over the years. But Cotterill said the underlying priority in its termination with Veolia was to maintain a “safe, smooth and thoughtful transition.”

He said Veolia initially sought more than $29 million, and the amount was agreed upon through mediation. The alternative was the cost and time of litigation.

“Those kinds of arguments are really great for lawyers and really bad for customers,” Cotterill added.

The city has not yet responded to Consumer Ratepayers’ Dec. 17 filing with the IURC.  City officials hope the commission will approve the deal in the first quarter of next year.

The termination agreement provides that Veolia will continue to manage the water utility on a temporary basis until the deal is closed.

Citizens said it expects to hire “substantially all” of Veolia’s 436 employees at the water utility.


  • funny in deed!
    im just glad they will hire "substantially all" of the same 436 Indianapolis people that have made Veolia water what is is today...(an ISO 9001 Fortune 500 company?) i i think not and agree wtih JIM.. "SMOKE AND MIRRORS"
  • veolia scam
    this company only operates with smoke and mirrors. The only way they make money is when a cash strapped city has to pay them millions to break the contract early due to poor performance and sub-par management teams like the one in place in the San Francisco Bay area. Lot of problems out west.
  • Funny
    i seen the writing on the wall when the city offered to buy the Indianapolis Water Co. back in 2002. The city, then ran by Mayor Bart Peterson out and out lied to all the employees of the water co. about their benefits never to be changed under the buy out agreement. Guess what? The benefits did change and not for the better, which forced me to retire at to much of an early age. So No I dont think any thing is funny anymore when it concerns any dealings of The Indianapolis Water co. to many peoples lives have taken a turn for the worse, considering the change of benefits that James Morris, the then Pres. of IWC, who sold the company and pocketed some 5 million dollars, and Peterson said would not happen. And I applaud long time friend and fellow worker Tom Plummer on his long time continued efforts to bring truth to the table.
  • Does anyone else think it's kinda funny...
    Does anyone else think it's kinda funny that John Price, the attorney representing the Consumer Ratepayers, was an attorney for IWC until 2 years ago? or that two of the raterpayers in this case have the same last name as Carlton Curry, who previously ran IWC?

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.