IBJNews

Groups allege state pharmacy official violated ethics rules

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two activist groups are asking Indiana's inspector general to investigate whether the former president of the state pharmacy board who works for Walgreen Co. violated state rules by advocating for the company's overhaul of its pharmacy-counter setup.

Consumer advocacy groups Common Cause Indiana and Change to Win on Monday submitted a complaint to the inspector general arguing that former Pharmacy Board President William Cover committed ethics code violations.

Cover, also employed as Walgreen’s manager of pharmacy affairs, worked behind the scenes in 2011 to promote the board’s approval of a new pharmacy format in Walgreen’s Indiana stores, according to the group complaint.

At one point, board members held closed meetings with Walgreen management in Illinois—organized in part by Cover—that essentially circumvented Indiana laws requiring open meetings, the watchdog groups said.

Despite the obvious conflict of interest, Cover acted “as an advocate” for Walgreen in the process, according to the complaint. In addition, Walgreen received unfair privileges in the approval process as a result of Cover's intervention.

“Walgreens and the Board of Pharmacy’s disregard for Indiana’s executive branch ethics policies is deeply disappointing,” said Julia Vaughn, Policy Director of Common Cause Indiana, in a prepared statement. “Good policy is rarely made behind closed doors, and it is simply unacceptable for anyone to take advantage of their position in state government for private profit.”

Indiana Professional Licensing Agency spokeswoman Sue Swayze told The Indianapolis Star that Cover was merely coordinating logistical issues before the 2011 board vote to approve the remodeling. Cover abstained from that vote.

The format, called the “Well Experience,” moves pharmacists from behind a counter to a floor workstation closer to customers. Common Cause and Change to Win say the new setup risks patient privacy and drug theft when pharmacists leave their stations to assist customers.

Walgreen Co. says the store layout is safe.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT