IBJNews

Hamilton County I-69 widening will reduce lanes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Commuters using busy Interstate 69 through Hamilton County can expect more headaches soon.

Indiana Department of Transportation spokesman Nathan Riggs told The Indianapolis Star that a project to widen I-69 at the 116th Street/Indiana 37 interchange in Fishers will restrict traffic to two lanes in both directions beginning in June. It also will cut the northbound I-69 ramp to the interchange to a single lane.

Overnight restrictions will begin Wednesday and last between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. daily.

Work on northbound lanes is due to wrap up in November. Work on southbound lanes begins next year.

INDOT says about 70,000 cars travel I-69 in each direction every day, much of it going into and leaving Indianapolis. Average daily traffic on Indiana 37 is 27,000 vehicles.

IBJ detailed the work planned for the 116th Street interchange in a July 16 story.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Read This to answer some questions.
    http://placeshakers.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/infrastructure-deficit-disorder/
  • When will it stop...
    Central Indiana will never be convinced we need a better public/mass transit system until MORE traffic jams are created. Improvement and widing of existing roads only makes it easier for people to drive. Unless driving is made more difficult and time-consuming, especially in the suburbs, there will be no incentive to create more densely-populated areas and develop more mass transit. Why can't all the time and money spent widing all these interstates be shifted to a forward-thinking mass transit system?
  • The real issue
    The issue isn't timing, but the dinasour mindset that we must widen roads to reduce congestion. ALL studies show that widening a road actually induces more traffic. It should also be noted that it is in the best interest of INDOT and other road businesses to provide a level of service at or below a 'C' so they always have work. As long as we continue to invest exclusively in single auto based transit, we will be plagued with traffic and congestion and unsustainable costs.
  • To Joe
    The real problem is the total lack of long range planning in this region. That a city and region our size doesn't have viable public transportation is unbelievable. That the freeway system is so under-developed that work like that being planned for this summer becomes a major headache for absolutely everybody; for some it'll affect them everyday for others only periodically. What tends to happen is that instead of gradual spending and improvements over a long period of time, we get stuck with huge costs periodically just in an attempt to keep up with population growth.
  • Construction project timing
    As a regular I-69 commuter I am glad something is finally being done to address worsening traffic on this congested corridor. But I have to wonder why it is timed to begin at the same time that two of the most critical alternate routes (US31 and Allisonville Road) are both under construction as well. This leaves only Keystone as the main artery from Hamilton to Marion counties. I shudder to think what a nightmare this route will become while other projects are underway. Does anyone consider these things when planning the timing of major construction projects?
  • Bottomless pot of gold.....
    I've lost track of how much money I spend every year to subsidize commuter habits out to the north....has anyone kept a tab?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

    2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

    3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

    4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

    5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

    ADVERTISEMENT