IBJNews

Hancock County utilities set to proceed with merger

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A merger of two Hancock County utility cooperatives is set to become official Jan. 1 after members of each voted on Saturday to approve the consolidation.

The joining of rural Central Indiana Power and Hancock Telecom may not seem unusual, particularly because the two small coops pursued the marriage in hopes of saving money.

“There’s a lot of fixed overhead that is costly when you have a relatively small customer base,” said Mike Burrow, Hancock Telecom’s vice president and general counsel.

But it took a change in state law to allow for a merger between coops that offer different services. Moreover, it’s just the second merger of its kind in the United States—the other occurred in remote Dillingham, Alaska.

Indiana law previously prevented what was known as a “hybrid” merger between rural telephone and electric utilities. Central Indiana Power and Hancock Telecom recruited the Indiana Statewide Association of Rural Electric Corporations and the Indiana Exchange Carriers Association to lobby on their behalf.

The legislation, which became effective July 1, cleared the Senate unanimously, 50-0, and the House by a nearly impressive margin of 99-1.

Details of the merger call for Central Indiana Power to be rolled into Hancock Telecom, though no money exchanged hands in the transaction, Burrow said.

Directors of both decided to fold Central Indiana Power into Hancock Telecom mainly because of the federal and state telecommunications licenses the telephone, broadband and IP video services provider would have to re-apply for if it became part of another company.

The board is working on a new name for the combined entity.

Hancock Telecom has 79 employees, and Central Indiana Power has 33. No employees are slated to lose their jobs due to the merger, Burrow said.

Cost savings could come from Central Indiana Power’s use of Hancock Telecom’s 24-hour call center. The electric utility currently uses a Minnesota company, which routes after-hours calls to the utility. Also, Hancock Telecom could use Central Indiana Power’s linemen to run fiber-optic lines on power poles, Burrow said.

“It’s not something you see very often, the mixture of two utilities,” he said.

Both companies will keep their separate locations, which are about six miles apart. However, within the next three to four years, directors likely will begin exploring the possibility of either building a new facility or leasing space to house employees under one roof, Burrow said.

Roughly 85 percent of Hancock Telecom and more than 83 percent of Central Indiana Power members who attended the meeting on Saturday voted in favor of the consolidation.

Founded in 1936, Central Indiana Power serves nearly 12,000 customers in Hancock, Madison, Hamilton and Rush counties.

Founded in 1895, Hancock Telecom has 9,000 customers in Hancock, Hamilton, Henry, Madison, Rush and Shelby counties.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT