IBJOpinion

HARTON: Escape your 'information cocoon'

Tom Harton
April 10, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tom Harton CommentaryMy mom used to remind me that too much of anything—even a good thing—could have negative consequences. I don’t think she ever uttered the words “law of diminishing returns,” but that’s what she was talking about. Too much food makes you sick. Too much time in the sun makes you red and sore.

If there’s an exception to the rule, it’s that you can never have too much information—that’s the commonly accepted wisdom, at least. The information age is almost always spoken of in glowing terms. Information is empowering, so we’re told, even if it comes from a cave in the Middle East or a basement down the block or a corporate media machine that needs something—anything—to fill the gaps between the advertising on a 24-hour news channel.

But what if the information is slanted, or worse, just plain wrong?

And what if the overabundance of information you’re swimming in comes, all the time, from the same news organization, the same bloggers, the same friends forwarding e-mails of unknown origin that they know you’ll agree with?

I remember sitting in a windowless meeting room at a conference of newspaper editors sometime in the 1990s hearing a futurist tell us that, sometime in the not-too-distant future, consumers of news and entertainment would read, hear and see only that which they ordered sent to their televisions, computers and communications devices.

I found the concept alarming at the time.

Well, that future is here, and what I’ve feared ever since hearing the futurist is coming true. Americans are comfortably—sadly—wrapped up in individual information cocoons, a term recently used by New York Times columnist David Brooks in a discussion of the distorted views of partisans.

The political set, especially those whose paycheck depends on the success of their party, has always operated wearing blinders. But in this age of plentiful information—a condition that one might think would cause folks to consider many points of view—more and more people are wearing blinders.

People get the sound bites—or doomsday essays—they want, when they want them. Convenience is king. Discovery is dead.

When is the last time you happened upon some information that changed your mind or caused you to at least question a long-held belief?

Did you make up your mind about health care reform long before the final vote? If you’re certain it’s evil and will lead the country to ruin, can you at least articulate the arguments in favor of it without getting angry?

If you’re on the other side and think reform is just what the doctor ordered, can you dispassionately recite any of the negative consequences that opponents of reform raise as concerns? Can you concede that some of those concerns might be legitimate?

If not, you need to add some new information to your diet. Maybe you’re only getting the “us versus them” garbage churned out by politicians and their parties, which is then refined and made more vile by the true believers. If that’s the case, you need to take a deep breath and read something about the issue that isn’t dripping with sarcasm or laced with partisan zingers designed to discredit the “enemy.”

If you’re on the left and want to be entertained, watch Keith Olbermann on MSNBC, but don’t mistake what you hear for information. If you’re on the right, watch Glenn Beck, but don’t consider what he’s telling you as anything other than red meat intended to satisfy your conservative appetite.

Better yet, if you want to be entertained, watch “The Office,” or “Dancing with the Stars,” or whatever you consider a good escape. When you want information, read a newspaper that doesn’t have an agenda. Read a variety of them. And flip through all the pages—or scroll from the top of the screen to the bottom. You might learn something new.•

__________

Harton is editor of IBJ. To comment on this column, send e-mail to tharton@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT