IBJOpinion

HARTON: Our environment provides another path to better health

Tom Harton
April 24, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tom HartonNews flash: Our bad habits are contributing to the growing cost of health care.

On any given day, you can read or watch numerous reports on the topic. Almost as regularly, there are accounts of insurance companies or others with a stake in our collective health launching, expanding or otherwise singing the praises of a wellness program. Such programs have been around since the 1970s. At a cost of billions of dollars annually, they are meant to help us identify our health problems before they become serious and to encourage us to modify our harmful behaviors.

These are worthy goals. No doubt about it. And there is a return on the investment. One recent study showed that medical costs fall more than $3 for every $1 spent on wellness programs. But something doesn’t add up. Overall, the cost of care isn’t falling and our bad habits aren’t going away. Trying to change behaviors one person at a time isn’t working well as a stand-alone strategy. The war for good health needs to be waged on a broader front—one that changes our surroundings, not just our minds.

What we need is a ground offensive—literally. Our built environment—the streets, sidewalks, buildings and other improvements that surround us—is getting more and more attention for the role it plays in obesity, diabetes, respiratory ailments—even mental health disorders.

We’ve abandoned the village, both urban and rural, that societies have embraced since the beginning of time. Over the last 70 years or so, we’ve built a nation of wide roads, narrow or non-existent sidewalks, and long distances that have trapped us in our cars and isolated us in our homes. The (fat) bottom line is that we spend a lot more time sitting than we do moving around. We are connected with the world via the Internet, but separated from physical activity and our neighbors by pavement, metal and glass.

Academics and public health advocates are awakening to the problem. But the concept of improving health by improving our built environment remains far removed from the mainstream. Why else would we continue spending millions to change individual behaviors while largely ignoring what drives those behaviors?

WellPoint spent $564 million last year on wellness and associated programs—a mere 1 percent of the premiums it collects, but still a big number. Yet there is not a single representative from WellPoint or any other insurance company on the board of an important local organization you’ve probably never heard of: The Alliance for Health Promotion.

The alliance is a 25-year-old not-for-profit that grew out of the Marion County Health Department. Its 4-year-old signature initiative—Health by Design—tries to build awareness of the connection between design and good health and promotes policy changes aimed at improving the built environment.

Health by Design could become the city’s biggest ally in battling poor health by literally changing the landscape, but it limps along on a county-funded budget of $125,000 a year and one full-time employee, Executive Director Kim Irwin. It does boast 200 community partners—many of them professional associations and groups like the Hoosier Environmental Council. Irwin says those partners sometimes fund specific initiatives, but they don’t pay dues.

In spite of its meager funding and skeleton staff, Health by Design is mixing it up in the halls of power. Its Complete Streets legislation in this year’s General Assembly would have dictated that road projects accommodate all users—not just cars and trucks. The bill passed the House in watered-down form but didn’t get a hearing in the Senate. It was opposed by the Indiana Department of Transportation.

It’s puzzling that a community—a country—full of smart people who are trying to rein in health care costs can’t get fully behind public policy changes that would improve our health. Alternative transportation, zoning changes and incentives for urban infill development would all contribute to denser, walkable communities where exercise is a way of life, not an entry on someone’s to-do list.

Those changes wouldn’t be free, but they’d be cheaper in the long run than what we’re relying on today—teaching people from now until the end of time how to live healthy in a sick environment and hoping they comply.•

__________

Harton is editor of IBJ. His column appears monthly. To comment on this column, send e-mail to tharton@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT