HDG Mansur affiliate losing ownership of Market Tower

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An affiliate of embattled Indianapolis developer HDG Mansur has been ordered to sell Market Tower, one of the city’s largest office towers, after defaulting on loans totaling $60 million.

Marion Superior Court Judge Tim Oakes entered the judgment against MT Acquisitions LLC during a Tuesday hearing in which lender Union Bank sought to foreclose on the 30-story building at 10 W. Market St.

The tower now is set to be sold at sheriff’s sale at an undetermined date. But HDG Mansur hopes to find a buyer before then, said Zeff Weiss, a partner at Ice Miller LLP who is representing the developer.

“We think it’s a great building and an icon for the city of Indianapolis,” he said.

HDG Mansur President Harold Garrison developed Market Tower at a cost of $92 million in the late 1980s with former business partner Lee Alig, who retains no ownership in the building. Market Tower ranks as the city’s sixth-largest downtown office building, according to IBJ statistics, with roughly 517,500 square feet of rentable space. It’s also the fourth-tallest building downtown and fifth-tallest in Indiana, at 421 feet.

Union Bank sued in December to foreclose on the tower. The bank said in court filings that MT Acquisitions borrowed $52.5 million from PB Capital Corp. in 2004 and another $12.5 million in 2007, pushing the total amount owed to $65 million.

In June 2013, Union Bank acquired the assets of PB Realty, a subsidiary of PB Capital, and filed to foreclose on Market Tower. The bank said in its suit that the $57.4 million principal left on MT Acquisitions’ loan came due in November.

Union Bank isn't the only entity with an interest in the tower that is raising legal challenges with MT Acquisitions.
Cassidy Turley, which leases and manages the building, and another brokerage, CBRE Inc., filed liens against MT Acquisitions totaling about $2 million, further suggesting that HDG Mansur may be in financial trouble.

Cassidy Turley’s two liens, one for $722,201 and another for $288,063, are for property management fees and commissions, respectively.

CBRE’s lien of $958,531 is for commissions only. In the commercial real estate business, the owner of a building typically pays all commissions involving a tenant lease deal.

The judge ordered MT Acquisitions to pay the brokerages from any money it might have left after satisfying its mortgage debt.

The foreclosure of Market Tower comes as HDG Mansur attempts to fend off a federal investigation stemming from another lawsuit.

IBJ reported earlier this month that the company divulged in court documents that it’s the target of a federal criminal probe for allegedly skimming millions of dollars from a client.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.