Head of Lilly's oncology unit resigning

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. said Tuesday morning that senior vice president John H. Johnson, president of the company's oncology unit, has resigned.

Indianapolis-based Lilly said in a press release that personal and family considerations led to Johnson's decision to leave the company. However, according to Bloomberg News, Johnson has been hired by as CEO of East Brunswick, N.J.-based biotechnology company Savient Pharmaceuticals Inc. 

Johnson’s resignation from Lilly Oncology is effective Friday. A successor will be named in the coming weeks, Lilly said.

Savient, a drug development firm that failed to find a buyer last year, named Johnson, 52, to help market its newly approved gout drug, Krystexxa. He will start at Savient on Jan. 31. Savient President Paul Hamelin, who had been leading the company, will leave after a transition period.

Lilly’s oncology research received a boost when the company purchased New York-based ImClone Systems Inc. for $6.5 billion in 2008, the largest acquisition in Lilly’s history. Johnson, ImClone’s CEO at the time, was brought on to lead Lilly’s oncology business. Previously, he headed Johnson & Johnson’s biopharmaceuticals unit.

“Given his previous post at ImClone, John has played a key role leading the integration efforts since Lilly’s acquisition,” Lilly President and CEO John Lechleiter said in a prepared statement. “He has always been a champion of serving patients and has guided the Lilly Oncology pipeline to an all-time high—one of the largest clinical-stage pipelines of potential cancer medicines in the industry.”

However, results of Lilly’s oncology efforts have been mixed lately.

In December, the company suspended a late-stage clinical trial of a medicine for skin-cancer patients after 12 patients in the study died.

And, in October, a study found that Lilly and Merck KGaA’s Erbitux drug failed to help colon cancer patients, which may leave doctors less likely to combine the drug with a certain type of chemotherapy. However, the drug was found to delay the spread of breast cancer by about two months in a study of women with a certain type of aggressive tumor.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.