IBJNews

Lilly suspends late-stage trial for melanoma drug

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. suspended a late-stage clinical trial of a medicine for skin-cancer patients after 12 patients in the study died.

The deaths, among the 300 patients in the study, “may be treatment-related,” said Amy Sousa, a Lilly spokeswoman, in a telephone interview Monday. Lilly was testing the drug, tasisulam, as a medication for patients whose skin cancer had spread and who didn’t benefit from earlier treatment, the Indianapolis-based company said in a prepared statement.

Lilly has struggled to get new products approved before patents expire on older medicines, led by the antipsychotic treatment Zyprexa. Two setbacks in October for diabetes products under development spurred analysts to suggest Lilly look for acquisitions to bolster revenue.

“We are thoroughly reviewing the clinical trial data to understand what modifications to the study protocol or dosing would be needed to improve patient safety on this trial,” Richard Gaynor, Lilly’s vice president of oncology product development and medical affairs, said in the statement.

No new or existing patients will be given the drug while the company evaluates safety data for the trial, which is spread across 18 countries. Studies will continue in breast, ovarian, and renal cancers and against soft-tissue sarcoma, the company said. Tasisulam works by killing cancer cells and also by preventing them from replicating, the company has said.

About 68,130 new cases of melanoma, or skin cancer, were diagnosed this year in the United States, and about 8,700 people died from the disease, according to the National Cancer Institute, based in Bethesda, Md.

Lilly shares declined less than 1 percent in extended trading after dropping 1 cent, to $34.97 each at the markets close Monday.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT