IBJNews

2014 Health Care Heroes: Indigo BioSystems' ASCENT software

Tom Harton
March 6, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Health Care HeroesCategory

Advancements in Health Care

Indigo BioSystems’ ASCENT software

 In a time of skyrocketing health care costs and lower reimbursements, medical laboratories are hungry for cost savings. Put those cost savings together with improved accuracy and quicker turnaround times, and you’ve got a winner.

That’s the promise of Indianapolis-based Indigo BioSystems and its ASCENT laboratory software, which is gaining a big following. Indigo now has 12 clients using ASCENT, including the three largest diagnostic lab companies in the country.

Randy Julian, the former Eli Lilly and Co. scientist who founded Indigo BioSystems in 2004, said ASCENT hits a sweet spot, not just for labs but for patients.

hch_julian.jpg Randy Julian (IBJ Photo/Eric Learned)

“Patients care about accuracy,” Julian said. In the laboratory setting, “we’ve eliminated human error as a reason for a misdiagnosis.”

ASCENT takes a process commonly used in drug discovery research and speeds it up for use in diagnostic labs.

“It took a couple of years to figure out how to take the human element out of the process,” Julian said. The result was a software platform that automates the conversion of raw data into actionable information for health care providers, improving accuracy but also saving time and money.

With Medicare reducing reimbursements for lab testing and private insurers following suit, labs that can’t make the numbers work are more likely to outsource their work. That means more shipping of samples and more opportunity for mix-ups and errors.

An early adopter of the ASCENT software was Indianapolis-based AIT Laboratories. Shortly after AIT began using the software back in 2011, company officials said it was a “game changer” for how the company manages data in terms of efficiency and quality.

“We liked the testing so much that we decided to pick up the product,” said Jason Lichti, a laboratory business analyst at AIT.

Typically, after a test runs on lab instruments, the results have to be reviewed by a technician, then reviewed again by someone else. With ASCENT, those steps are eliminated and accuracy is improved, because the software can catch things people can’t.

Lichti said ASCENT has halved AIT’s turnaround time in returning results to health care providers.

For all ASCENT’s potential to save labs time and money, accuracy was the biggest selling point for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, which began using ASCENT in 2012 for the large population studies it conducts. The results of those studies play a big role in guiding public health policy.

“We’ve given them the most accurate numbers possible for things like trans fats in blood,” Julian said. Those results can play a big role in deciding, for example, whether trans fats simply need to be disclosed on product labeling or whether they need to be banned altogether.•

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT