Health care industry braces for reform

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Year In Review

Congress is on the cusp of transforming health insurance—if it can pass a health reform bill that was losing popularity late in the year.

The Senate proposal would levy various new taxes to pay for subsidies to help 30 million more Americans buy health insurance through a newly created exchange. It also would force insurance companies to accept all comers and would fine individuals and most employers that fail to buy or provide coverage.

President Obama’s attempt to reform health insurance sparked debate and demonstrations across the country. (AP Photo)

The mandates and the subsidies—$34 billion a year—would boost business at Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. and its peers. But WellPoint turned against the reform effort when the Senate reduced to $750 the fines for individuals who don’t buy insurance. The small fines would lead many people to wait to buy insurance until they contract an expensive illness, WellPoint predicted, because insurers now must accept them.

Also opposing the bill have been medical-device companies, such as Cook Group Inc. in Bloomington and orthopedic-implant maker Zimmer Holdings Corp. in Warsaw. The industry would pay $2 billion a year in new taxes, regardless of profit levels.

Drugmakers such as Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. like the idea of 30 million better-paying customers. And Lilly is so far getting its key wish—a 12-year waiting period for generic competitors of its biotech drugs, instead of the five-year delay now required for the cheaper generic versions of its chemical drugs.

Doctors and hospitals also are glad reform would reduce their numbers of uninsured customers. But some worry the larger number of insured patients will overwhelm primary-care doctors, who are already in short supply in Indiana and nationally. After Massachusetts passed a similar law in 2006, waiting times for doctors soared.

Congress would use the federal-state Medicaid insurance program for 37 percent of the coverage expansion—a disappointment to doctors and hospitals since Medicaid pays health care providers about 40-percent less than private insurance plans do. The state of Indiana predicts it will have to increase its Medicaid payments by $118 million a year to attract enough doctors to see the higher-earning patients that Congress will make eligible for the program.•




Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.