IBJNews

Health care suppliers need to think long term, expert says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Companies in the health care supply chain need to engage in more strategic, long-term preparation even as the health care industry faces uncertainties and upheaval in regulation as well as logistics disruptions from volcanoes to flu pandemics.

The challenge was delivered by Mahender Singh, research director of the MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics, at the opening session of the Midwest Healthcare Supply Chain Conference.

More than 150 people are registered for the two-day conference at the Indiana Convention Center in downtown Indianapolis. The event was launched last year by the Indianapolis Airport Authority and the Indiana Health Industry Forum.

Singh said many firms are too focused on day-to-day cost and operational efficiencies and need to look more at experimentation and innovation as a way to prepare for a rapidly evolving and uncertain future for the health care supply chain.

Even if anticipated scenarios don’t occur, the effort could have payback in ways not anticipated. For example, a firm that believed an earthquake might strike Southern China could in advance set up alternative sourcing of materials from Latin America.

The earthquake might not occur, but that arrangement could pay off if avian flu again disrupts China, Singh said.

“Many, many different events tend to have similar effects … There are a lot of things happening around us today, events that are happening that we are not thinking about.”

The health care supply chain, which involves everything from pharmaceutical companies to medical device makers and logistics firms, has been hit with a number of disruptions, from volcanic disruptions in Iceland to the financial meltdown in Europe to continuing uncertainty involving the implications of federal health care reform.

But Singh noted that there are also some trends that can be anticipated with more certainty, such as the implications of an aging demographic and the rising percentage of care that will be delivered for chronic diseases.

Chronic disease will require care to be delivered around the clock and, more often, in the patient’s home rather than in a hospital.

That might mean the supply chain may swing more from deliveries to the hospital to deliveries to residences.

“These events we know are coming,” Singh said.

One conference participant asked Singh how such preparations can be justified to upper managers reluctant to spend money toward longer-term, hard-to-anticipate events.

He suggested looking beyond short-term costs and more toward other potential future benefits.

For example, FedEx and UPS could have balked at the cost of developing such a precise package-tracking system for merely their own internal use. But those companies thought beyond internal use, realizing that such costly and sophisticated systems had value to customers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT