IBJNews

Study weakens Lilly's fight against price controls

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Eli Lilly and Co. and its peers might be back in Congress’ sights as lawmakers hunt for more ways to cut health care costs.

A new study in the influential Health Affairs journal concludes that European drugmakers operating in markets with pharmaceutical price controls have produced proportionally more innovations than their U.S. counterparts.

The study undercuts an argument made over and over again by Lilly execs: that health reform must preserve profit potential for pharmaceuticals so companies can afford to keep pumping out innovative new drugs.

“One policy ‘truth’ in pharmaceuticals is that price controls hurt innovation. If price controls don’t in fact diminish innovation as the recent study implies (contradicting previous work), then regulators in the U.S. can pressure prices,” health care stock analyst Les Funtleyder, of Miller Tabak & Co., wrote in a note to investors. That could hurt drugmakers’ stock prices and diminish their pipelines of new drugs, he added.

A health reform bill in Congress would allow the federal Medicare program to negotiate discounts with drugmakers, something Lilly and its peers have opposed as akin to price controls. Also, President Obama has supported the reimportation of drugs to the United States from countries where they are sold at controlled prices.

The Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers Association issued a two-page statement rebutting the study’s conclusion.

“Unfortunately, the paper paints a distorted picture that gives short shrift to the medical advances made possible by America’s pharmaceutical research and biotechnology companies and ignores the chilling effect of government price controls on such innovation,” the association’s statement read.

In response to questions, a Lilly spokesman reissued the association’s statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Obama vs. Massingale
    Ok ,Mr. President are you ready for round 2, because now the people want to read your 1900 pages of Bill before it is passed into law.
     
    Henry Massingale
    FASC CONCEPTS
    for main page click on this link below
    www.fascmovement.mysite.com page1 american dream on google.com
  • Dear sir or Mrs.,
    A new concept that is offered, how it opens you thoughts and how you wish to share it will be of your design.
    A American Dream,a concept that will touch your mind and its truth for the building block for a HEALTHCARE RFEORM STIMULUS PACKAGE, that has never been conceived within the 21st century of man s thoughts.It will put a smile on your face. The people do not want the system to take care of them, Im sorry but this is true.
    Please visit us on google.com and search for www.fascmovement.mysite.com

    All we ask is that you PAY IT FORWARD
    Henry Massingale
    561 734 1376

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT