IBJNews

Healthy Indiana Plan gets mixed reviews at hearing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hospital officials praised Indiana's medical savings accounts but some consumer advocates panned them Wednesday during a public hearing as Gov. Mike Pence seeks federal approval to use the Healthy Indiana Plan to expand Medicaid in this state.

The Indiana Hospital Association and representatives of hospitals in Indianapolis, Lake County and rural Rush County testified HIP would achieve the Medicaid expansion under the federal health care overhaul and reduce the amount of indigent care they must provide to uninsured patients.

But critics noted HIP isn't available to everyone and even when it is, it can prove too costly for some low-income Indiana residents needing medical care.

"I do not believe it will do what we need to do to cover people," said Rep. Sue Errington, D-Muncie.

Pence has proposed using HIP to complete a Medicaid expansion for Indiana residents earning up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. That's a sliding scale that includes $15,856 for a single individual or $32,499 for a household of four.

If the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services approves Pence's proposal, it could provide coverage for as many as 400,000 low-income residents. If CMS rejects it, it could end coverage for about 40,000 residents already enrolled in HIP. A decision must to be made by June, six months before the state's current waiver expires. Also, Pence has said he might not sign off on the expansion using HIP even if CMS approves it.

Ian McFadden, president and CEO of Methodist Hospitals in Gary and Merrillville, backs the HIP expansion because the federal Disproportionate Share Hospital funding they now receive for treating uninsured patients might be cut as much as 50 percent beginning next year under the health care overhaul.

"The DSH funding cuts represent a great concern for our hospital and all the safety net hospitals around the state," McFadden said. "We cannot afford to wait. We must be prepared to begin enrolling individuals."

Doug Leonard, president of the Indiana Hospital Association, read a letter it sent to Health and human Services Secretary Katherine Sebelius urging here to grant the HIP renewal and use it for Medicaid expansion because it promotes personal responsibility among health care consumers.

"The IHA believes HIP has been a success and should be continued," he said.

Jennifer Phelps of Indianapolis, representing the Indiana chapter of the March of Dimes, said an expanded HIP would enroll women from households earning no more than 138 percent of the poverty level but Medicaid now provides prenatal care for pregnant women earning up to twice the poverty level.

Rep. Sheila Klinker, D-Lafayette, said some people who have lost health care coverage through divorce haven't been able to enroll immediately in HIP.

"They are not able to get HIP. ... They are not able to get the health care that they need," Klinker said.

The second hearing is scheduled Friday. Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault has said Indiana's application to renew and expand the Healthy Indiana Plan is expected to be submitted to CMS by April 11.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • HIP: Success Measures Not Apparent
    I have read numerous articles and heard quotes made by the Governor stating that the HIP is successful. However, I have yet to see any presentation of the measures being used to declare HIP a success. Is it because patients receive "prompt" care? Costs are lower? Healthcare outcomes are better? Where's the beef?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT