IBJNews

Hearings on Walgreens' bid to sell alcohol continued

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hearings scheduled Monday morning to consider Walgreens’ requests for new alcohol permits at several of its stores in Marion County have been continued.

The Local Alcoholic Beverage Board was set to hear requests for 10 of 29 permits the Illinois-based drugstore chain is seeking in the county. But the board granted the retailer a continuance to give it more time to prepare.

Eight of the permit requests now are set to be heard April 19. Applications for a store in Beech Grove and another in Lawrence are set for May 3.

Walgreens is requesting the right to sell beer and wine in at least 53 stores in central Indiana, including 29 in Marion County. Because of the continuance, the beverage board could begin hearing some of the other 19 requests for permits as soon as March 15, its next scheduled meeting.

Walgreens stopped selling alcohol more than a decade ago. But competition, mainly from rival Rhode Island-based CVS Caremark Corp., is prompting the change in policy.

That is sparking opposition among local community groups such as Drug Free Marion County and the Marion County Alliance of Neighborhood Associations. Representatives from both were among several concerned citizens prepared to contest the permits at the Monday hearing.

Norman Pace, the neighborhood alliance’s director for Warren Township, said two of the Walgreens seeking permission to sell alcohol are across from educational facilities.

He further argued that Indianapolis already has enough alcohol permits—more than 5,000—at bars, restaurants and grocery and convenience stores.

“We have already exceeded the capacity,” he said. “They’re handing out these alcohol permits like candy in a candy store.”

Nancy Beals, prevention program coordinator at Drug Free Marion County, concurred.

“It’s not that we don’t want Walgreens to sell alcohol,” she said. “We just don’t want the over-saturation.”

The alcoholic beverage board cannot grant permit approval. It only makes recommendations to the Indiana Alcohol Tobacco Commission.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • One Growing Organization
    Any doubt why AA is growing? Stats show 1 out of 10 are alcoholics. Did you get that? 1 out of 10!

    I suppose most can't wait to get a beer or marguerita with their Big Mac.
  • permits
    Why require permits to sell alcohol?
  • 2 for 1
    I guess someone can get something for their hangover while they get the booze that will give it to them. Does everybody need to be in the business. Why not give everyone a alcoholic beverage permit.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT